LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/Rumors of ACO Death Greatly Exaggerated
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

Rumors of ACO Death Greatly Exaggerated

July 6, 2017 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Rumors of ACO Death Greatly Exaggerated
Source: Wikimedia Commons and gnangarra
Secondary

Gregg Masters, MPH, director of HealthInnovation Media and reimbursement gadfly, recently wrote in his blog about the current status of Accountable Care Organizations (ACO).

In all the sturm-und-drang of Obamacare vs. Trumpcare, ACO are like the kids in the middle of divorcing parents. How are they doing?

Masters tackled that question with a really interesting chart. Here it is.

" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/ryortho.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Rumors_ACOGrowth_WEB.jpg?fit=730%2C385&ssl=1" src="https://i0.wp.com/ryortho.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Rumors_ACOGrowth_WEB.jpg?resize=730%2C385&ssl=1" alt="" width="730" height="385">
Source: Authors’ analysis of Leavitt Partners ACO Database

He went on to say in his healthcare blog: “As of the end of the first quarter of 2017, our inventory included 923 active public and private ACOs across the United States, covering more than 32 million lives. The increase of 2.2 million covered lives in the past year means that more than 10 percent of the U.S. population is now covered by an accountable care contract.”

A Little ACO Background

The Affordable Care Act (ACA aka Obamacare) was passed seven years ago (March of 2010). It set up ACOs. ACOs tie reimbursement to quality metrics and the cost of care. They are actually a lot like the old HMO model. ACOs can adopt alternative payment models. They’re accountable to patients and third-party payers for quality, cost and overall care.

Part of the appeal of the ACO approach was that rewards for cost savings and improved care would accrue to the physicians.

Advertisement

The ACA provided ACOs a two-sided reimbursement model ACOs shared savings and losses. ACOs were given a maximum sharing rate of 60%, provided that the minimum threshold of 2% is reached.

Lots of “experts” predicted that ACOs would fail.

ACOs, they said, had high startup costs and large annual expenses; patients could vote with their feet and leave the ACO; ACOs bore too much liability for the “reward” they were hoping for. And on and on.

Inexorably Rising Enrollment Despite CMS Cuts

Masters also made the point that Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollment is continuing to grow despite CMS [Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services] cuts. “With over 17 million Medicare beneficiaries voluntarily choosing MA thus far, and enrollment growing at more than 10 percent annually despite three years of CMS payment reductions in real dollars, it is increasingly clear the future of managed Medicare lies in the MA program.”

“Aetna, the Blues, United et al negotiated their version of ‘accountable care’ arrangements with participation IPAs, PHOs, IDNs, health systems, medical groups or physician networks. Five years later, we have some important data recently reported by Health Affairs that suggests ACOs are far from the neutered enterprises many suggested and while mixed in terms of results reported ACOs have found their place in the managed competition ecosystem and are not likely to disappear any time soon.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy