LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • Opinions
  • |My Feed
  • |Events
  • |Company Directory
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/Wenzel Spine Product Receives Patent
Spine

Wenzel Spine Product Receives Patent

September 10, 2013 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Wenzel Spine Product Receives Patent
Courtesy: Wenzel Spine, Inc.
Secondary

The United States patent office has granted a patent to Wenzel Spine, Inc. of Austin, Texas, for a product with one of the longest names in the industry. It is Wenzel Spine’s Zero-Profile VariLift® Stand-Alone Expandable Interbody Fusion System.

Chad Neely, CEO of Wenzel Spine, said, “With the issuance of this new patent, the Patent Office has confirmed Wenzel Spine’s innovative stance in this fast-paced technological arena. We have numerous additional patent applications under review and will continue to work to expand the Wenzel Spine patent portfolio as we continue to innovate and develop new products.”

The VariLift family of devices features zero-profile interbody designs, which allow for stand-alone use of the VariLift system for lumbar and cervical fusion procedures. Wenzel Spine’s Cervical and Lumbar VariLift Stand-Alone Expandable Interbody Fusion Systems are commercially available in the U.S. and Europe. The company offers minimally invasive solutions for stand-alone treatment of disc herniations, spinal stenosis, and spondylolisthesis.

Author

BW
Biloine W. Young
React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

Orthopedics This Week’s mission is to connect the orthopedic community with the people, ideas, and innovations shaping the future of musculoskeletal care.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Opinions
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, opinions, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy