LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • Opinions
  • |My Feed
  • |Events
  • |Company Directory
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Integra’s Titan (Reverse Shoulder) Lifts Off
Large Joints and Extremities

Integra’s Titan (Reverse Shoulder) Lifts Off

August 14, 2013 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Integra’s Titan (Reverse Shoulder) Lifts Off
Titan2 Liftoff / Source: Wikimedia Commons and Reuben Barton
Secondary

The folks at Integra LifeSciences Holding Corporation are celebrating. The FDA has granted a 510(k) clearance for its Titan Reverse Shoulder System. The company plans to begin a limited market release of the system in the U.S. in the third quarter of 2013 and, upon CE Mark clearance in Europe, initiate a full global commercial launch.

Integra officials explain that the Reverse Shoulder System is built on a platform stem, which simplifies the conversion of a primary total shoulder, or hemi for fracture, to a reverse shoulder, without the need to remove a stem that is well-fixed in the patient’s bone. The system offers fully interchangeable components, allowing all primary, reverse, and fracture humeral bodies to be used with either the press-fit or cemented platform stems.

Analysts anticipate that the global shoulder replacement market will reach nearly $865 million in 2014 and $1.3 billion by 2017. With the addition of the Titan Reverse Shoulder System that addresses both the press-fit and cemented reverse shoulder market, Integra believes that it is well positioned to gain a key foothold in this rapidly growing market.

Author

BW
Biloine W. Young
React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

Orthopedics This Week’s mission is to connect the orthopedic community with the people, ideas, and innovations shaping the future of musculoskeletal care.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Opinions
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, opinions, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy