LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • Opinions
  • |My Feed
  • |Events
  • |Company Directory
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Hip/Knee Infection Fighting System Gets FDA Approval
Large Joints and Extremities

Hip/Knee Infection Fighting System Gets FDA Approval

May 1, 2015 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Hip/Knee Infection Fighting System Gets FDA Approval
Courtesy of OsteoRemedies, LLC
Secondary

The first FDA approved modular system for dealing with two-stage revisions of infected hip and knee arthroplasty is produced and distributed by OsteoRemedies, LLC, of Memphis, Tennessee. Called the Remedy Spacer, the device is a sterile-packaged, pre-formed, pre-loaded spacer dosed with Gentamicin antibiotics which its distributor claims will provide a consistent and reliable elution to the infected joint spaces.

When combined with a consistent process for polishing the articulating surfaces, the Remedy spacer is approved for temporary use for up to 180 days.

Proponents say that the system enables surgeons to address a patients’ anatomy with complete interchangeability between femoral and tibial knee sizing for those revisions and a full modular femoral head and stem design for hip revisions. As a packaged solution the Remedy spacer is claimed to save time for the surgeon and the hospital when compared to traditional revision infection procedures.

Author

BW
Biloine W. Young
React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

Orthopedics This Week’s mission is to connect the orthopedic community with the people, ideas, and innovations shaping the future of musculoskeletal care.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Opinions
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, opinions, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy