LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/FDA Grants 510(k) Clearance for MRI-Compatible Interbody Implant
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

FDA Grants 510(k) Clearance for MRI-Compatible Interbody Implant

July 1, 2025 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

FDA Grants 510(k) Clearance for MRI-Compatible Interbody Implant
FlareHawk Interbody Fusion System / Source: Accelus
#501Kclearance#accelus#flarehawk

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted 510(k) clearance for the MRI-compatible FlareHawk Interbody Fusion System, developed by Accelus, a privately held medical technology company specializing in spinal implants.

According to the FDA’s 510(k) summary, the FlareHawk implant is indicated for spinal intervertebral body fusion procedures using autogenous bone graft and/or allogeneic bone graft composed of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone. The device is intended for use in skeletally mature individuals with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1, following a discectomy. Patients may also present with up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the affected level(s).

MRI Compatibility and Safety Profile

A key feature of this latest clearance is the device’s compatibility with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Extensive bench performance testing and validated modeling studies were conducted to evaluate magnetic field interactions, image artifacts, and radiofrequency (RF)-induced heating. These analyses included worst-case scenario simulations to ensure safety in clinically relevant muscle-like and bone tissues during MRI exposure.

The FlareHawk device is now cleared for safe MRI scanning under specific conditions:

  • Static Magnetic Field Strength: 1.5T or 3.0T
  • RF Excitation: Circularly Polarized (CP)
  • RF Transmit Coil Type: Volume RF body coil
  • Operating Mode: Normal Operating Mode
  • Maximum Whole-Body SAR: 2 W/kg
  • Maximum Head SAR: 3.2 W/kg
  • Scan Duration: Up to 60 minutes of continuous scanning
  • MR Image Artifact: Presence of the implant may produce localized image artifact

Substantial Equivalence and Regulatory Pathway

The FlareHawk system qualified for 510(k) clearance under the criteria of substantial equivalence to a previously cleared predicate device of the same name. This regulatory pathway permits earlier market entry for devices that demonstrate comparable safety and effectiveness to existing technologies.

Executive Commentary

Accelus President and CEO Kevin McGann emphasized the importance of this clearance in the context of patient care and surgical decision-making:

“The ability to confidently undergo MRI scans is an important factor for both patients and surgeons when selecting spinal implants,” McGann stated. “This additional clearance reinforces our commitment to offering safe, high-quality solutions that address the real-world needs of the spine surgery community.”

A Step Forward in Spine Care

The FDA’s clearance of the MRI-compatible FlareHawk implant reflects the growing demand for advanced, imaging-friendly interbody devices in spinal surgery. By combining structural performance with MR safety, Accelus continues to expand its portfolio of next-generation solutions designed to improve clinical outcomes and procedural flexibility.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy