LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/Seriously? This Is It for Docs (and Senior Patients)?
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

Seriously? This Is It for Docs (and Senior Patients)?

March 21, 2024 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Seriously? This Is It for Docs (and Senior Patients)?
Source: Shutterstock
#americanmedicalassociationSecondary#americanacademyoforthopaedicsurgeons#medicarephysicianfeeschedule

The federal spending bill passed earlier this month includes policies addressing cuts to the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) that went into effect at the beginning of this year 2024.

Earlier this year, a 3.37% cut to the MPFS went into effect. The just passed $460 billion spending package reduced the cut from 3.37% to 1.69%. The new rate went into effect earlier this month (March) and runs to the end of the year. There is not a provision for retroactive claims processing.

This reduction appears to respond to some of the concerns regarding physician pay cuts. However, the response of many of the leading medical organizations has been to point out that there may be larger issues.

Adam Bruggeman, M.D., FAAOS, FAOrthA, chair of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Advocacy Council, said, in a statement for AAOS: “We appreciate that our calls to Congress did not go completely unanswered, but the small relief provided by a less than 2% adjustment of this year’s cut to Medicare physician services hardly classifies as a solution.”

“Even the misinformation about this minor pay cut update being a ‘bonus’ is alarming and illustrates the lack of understanding around the bigger problem that is Medicare’s broken payment system.”

Dr. Bruggeman continued, “Until lawmakers address the underlying issue and implement long-term reforms, our patients in particular—who make up a large percentage of Medicare beneficiaries—will have a harder time accessing timely, quality care. AAOS will continue pressing Congress to protect patients with a permanent fix.”

American Medical Association (AMA) President Jesse M. Ehrenfeld, M.D., MPH expressed disappointment over the pay cuts. In an AMA statement, Dr. Ehrenfeld remarked, “While we appreciate the challenges Congress confronted when drafting the current 2024 appropriations package, we are extremely disappointed that about half of the 2024 Medicare physician payment cuts will be allowed to continue.”

Dr. Ehrenfeld continued, “There were many opportunities and widespread support to block the 3.37 percent Medicare cuts for physician services that took place Jan. 1, but in the end Congress opted to reverse only 1.68 of the 3.37 percentage payment reduction required by the Medicare Fee Schedule. The need to stop the annual cycle of pay cuts and patches and enact permanent Medicare payment reforms could not be more clear.”

For OTW’s previous coverage of AAOS and AMA advocacy regarding proposed pay cuts, see “AAOS And AMA Oppose Proposed CMS Physician Pay Cuts.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy