LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/SC Health System Pays $36.5M to Settle Kickback Allegations
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

SC Health System Pays $36.5M to Settle Kickback Allegations

July 5, 2023 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

SC Health System Pays $36.5M to Settle Kickback Allegations
Source: Unsplash and Celyn Kang
#falseclaimsactSecondary#stfrancishealthsystem

A Greenville, South Carolina-based healthcare system has agreed to pay $36.5 million to resolve kickback allegations that it was tying payments to orthopedic surgeons to referral volume and/or value.

St. Francis Physician Services, Inc., St. Francis Hospital, and Bon Secours St. Francis Health System, Inc. (collectively “St. Francis”), owner and operator of the St. Francis healthcare system, agreed to the payment to settle claims that it violated the False Claims Act, the Federal Stark Law, and the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute.

According to the Department of Justice press release, the settlement resolves allegations that “St. Francis caused the submission of false claims to Medicare and to TRICARE as a result of an unlawful contractual payment structure between St. Francis and Piedmont Orthopedic Associates (“POA”), whereby POA’s compensation was tied to the volume or value of the practice’s referrals to St. Francis.” The original complaint alleged that the bonus payments paid by St. Francis violated the Federal Stark Law and the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute.

The original complaint detailed the alleged violations and claimed that the purported “scheme” began in 2006. According to the allegations in the complaint, when faced with potential competition from POA, a strategy was developed to purportedly “lure the POA surgeons into becoming employees of the hospital system by paying them excessive compensation, including an annual bonus pool.”

Furthermore, according to the complaint, “the criteria used to determine whether the $3.95 million bonuses were paid each year incentivized and rewarded the physicians for generating referrals to the hospital system for physical therapy, laboratory, radiology, and other ancillary services.”

In the Department of Justice press release, U.S. Attorney for the District of South Carolina Adair F. Boroughs said, “Medical providers should base health care decisions on what is best for the patient, and not on financial incentives and related schemes.”

Boroughs continued, “We are grateful the relator brought these allegations forward. Relators are critical to identifying fraud and protecting the integrity of our Medicare system.”

Under the False Claims Act, a private party (called the relator) can file a lawsuit on behalf of the United States. The relator is then entitled to a share of the recovery. In this matter, the relator will receive $10.2 million of the settlement amount.

The claims resolved by the settlement are allegations only. There has been no determination of liability.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy