LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/FDA Expands Indications for Novel Soft Tissue Repair
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

FDA Expands Indications for Novel Soft Tissue Repair

June 23, 2023 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

FDA Expands Indications for Novel Soft Tissue Repair
Courtesy of Artelon, Inc.
Secondary#artelon#flexband#flexpatch

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted 510(k) clearance to three surgical mesh products, expanding the indications for use.

According to the FDA’s 510(k) summary document, the products are knitted mesh made from fibers “made of degradable polycaprolactone-based polyurethane urea.” The construction of the fibers “permits the mesh to be cut into any desired shape or size without unraveling.” Additionally, the devices “have suture attached to each end of the knitted mesh strip. The pre-loaded suture is intended to aid in usability in the operating room. The devices are supplied sterile, one product per package in double layer peel pouch packaging.”

Intended use is for reinforcement of soft tissue where weakness exists.

Furthermore, according to the FDA clearance document, the soft tissue repair products (manufacturer is Artelon, Inc.) “are also intended for reinforcement of soft tissues that are repaired by suture or other fixation devices during tendon and ligament repair surgery including:

  1. reinforcement of rotator cuff, patellar,
  2. Achilles,
  3. biceps,
  4. quadriceps tendons,
  5. medial collateral ligament,
  6. lateral collateral ligament,
  7. spring ligament,
  8. deltoid ligament,
  9. ulnar collateral ligament or
  10. other tendons or extra-articular ligaments.”

The FDA’s documents also noted where the devices are NOT intended for use—specifically, “to replace normal body structure or provide the full mechanical strength to support the rotator cuff, patellar, Achilles, biceps, quadriceps tendons, medial collateral ligament, lateral collateral ligament, spring ligament, deltoid ligament, ulnar collateral ligament or other tendons or extra-articular ligaments.”

Sutures, in other words, provide the mechanical strength for the tendon repair while Artelon’s products reinforce soft tissue and provide a degradable scaffold that is incorporated into the patient’s own tissue. In short, Georgia based Artelon, Inc., the company that submitted the devices for 510(k) clearance, improves outcomes.

The devices affected by the clearance announcement are the FlexBand®, FlexPatch®, and FlexBand® Plus.

All three products use Artelon’s Dynamic Matrix® technology which is, according to the company, a “proprietary polymeric bio-textile for musculoskeletal soft tissue reinforcement.”

Advertisement

For OTW’s recent coverage of Artelon and its Dynamic Matrix technology, see “Joint Kinematics and Stability Firm, Artelon, Raises $20 Million.”

Artelon CEO Aaron Smith commented, “This new regulatory clearance establishes a unique and specific framework of U.S. marketing claims for reinforcement of ligaments.”

Smith continued, “Recent innovation in our space has been mostly focused on fixation of ligaments to bone, but little has been done to address failure of the ligament tissues themselves, which are often diseased and may lead to poor surgical outcomes. We are currently a leader in the large and growing U.S. ankle instability market. This new set of claims permits us to take on a multitude of unmet clinical challenges in the ankle and other joints and dramatically expand our addressable market.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy