LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/People In The News/Michelle Ghert, M.D., Team Win Kappa Delta Ann Doner Vaughn Award
People In The News

Michelle Ghert, M.D., Team Win Kappa Delta Ann Doner Vaughn Award

March 20, 2023 3 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Michelle Ghert, M.D., Team Win Kappa Delta Ann Doner Vaughn Award
Michelle Ghert, M.D. / Courtesy of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
#kappadeltaanndonervaughnaward#michelleghert

Michelle Ghert, M.D. and the Prophylactic Antibiotic Regimens in Tumor Surgery (PARITY) Investigators have been honored with the 2023 Kappa Delta Ann Doner Vaughn Award for the first-ever international multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) in orthopedic oncology.

The award, which recognizes research excellence in the musculoskeletal arena with great potential to advance patient care, was presented at the recent annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS).

Their work focused on the prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs) through antibiotic prophylaxis following oncologic reconstruction surgery for bone tumors. It represents the largest collaborative effort in orthopedic surgery as far as the number of countries participating.

“In the field of medicine, conducting a 600-patient randomized study isn’t out of the ordinary,” said Dr. Ghert, principal investigator, professor, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. “However, in orthopaedic oncology, where we treat rare diseases, it was a shift in our research paradigm.”

“While initially there wasn’t much optimism that this study would work, we believed it was time to move forward for our patients and the research question really resonated. I give a lot of credit to the first few clinical sites that joined the study as they took a leap of faith.”

The research group consisted of experts from orthopedic oncology, infectious diseases, clinical epidemiology, biostatistics and health research methodology. The investigators, from 55 clinical centers in 12 countries, sought to fill in the information gap on studies looking at the role of antibiotic regimens for surgical reconstruction of lower extremity bone tumors.

The research team enrolled 604 patients who were diagnosed with primary bone or soft-tissue sarcoma or oligometastatic (a more treatable form of metastatic cancer) bone disease in the femur or tibia with an expected survival of one year who required surgical resection and implant reconstruction.

Patients were randomized to a one- or five-day regimen (311 to one day and 293 to five day) of postoperative intravenous antibiotics within eight hours of skin closure—and then administered every eight hours after that.

Advertisement

The PARITY researchers found that 15% of patients on the five-day regimen and 16.7% on the one-day regimen had a surgical site infection, with the most common causes being Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococci. They found a significant increase in antibiotic-related complications in the five-day regimen group, with the main complication reported to be antibiotic-associated diarrhea caused by Clostridioides difficile.

“The risk for surgical site infections was not significantly different for five days or one day, so when surgeons write post-operative orders, they have that information to work with,” said Dr. Ghert. “However, one of the secondary outcomes demonstrated you could actually hurt the patient by causing severe antibiotic-related complications that can be life altering. When you have a patient who is already going through a very difficult time, chemotherapy and morbid surgery, surgeons need to weigh the risk before prescribing prolonged antibiotics as they can cause added gastrointestinal issues that can be chronic.”

When OTW asked about some of the hurdles they faced early on in the process, Dr. Ghert said, “First of all, there was a lack of precedence in the field and therefore trepidation of the unknown. In addition, we had to contend with a lack of experience and resources at individual clinical sites for participating in investigator initiated randomized trials.”

“Canada and Europe required regulatory approval in order to use intravenous cephalosporin. We experienced long delays in start-up at individual sites due to complex ethics approvals and contract negotiations. At times there was investigator fatigue and slow enrollment, as well as a lack of equipoise at some clinical sites that chose not to participate.”

As for any challenges related to diffusing this information and getting it adopted into practice, she added, “While the results of the study are fairly well known in the field, the fear of infection may overcome the known risk of antibiotic-related complications and surgeons may simply decide to continue with prolonged antibiotics in the attempt to avoid infection. Higher risk cases will likely still be considered indications for longer antibiotics, although there is still no evidence to support this practice.”

And what did Dr. Ghert tell OTW in the form of advice for up-and-coming orthopedic oncologists-researchers? “For prospective principal investigators: focused research training at centers such as at McMaster University, is essential. For prospective participating clinical sites: be passionate about participating in studies, be an advocate at your hospital and push through challenges with the help of the coordinating center and research team, stay engaged.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy