LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/510(k) Clearance for Expandable Anterior Lumbar Interbody System
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

510(k) Clearance for Expandable Anterior Lumbar Interbody System

March 13, 2023 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

510(k) Clearance for Expandable Anterior Lumbar Interbody System
El Capital X / Courtesy of Astura Medical
Secondary#asturamedical#elcapitanx

An expandable anterior lumbar interbody system has received U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 510(k) clearance.

The device, according to the FDA 510(k) summary document, is indicated for “intervertebral body fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the lumbar spine at one or two contiguous levels from L1-L2 to L5-S1.”

According to the FDA document, “DDD is defined as discogenic pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies.” Additionally, these DDD patients may also have “up to Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s).” The system implants “are to be used with autogenous bone graft and supplemental fixation.” Patients should have “at least six (6) months of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with an intervertebral cage.” The spacer and plate assembly are an “integrated interbody fusion device intended for stand-alone use when used with all titanium alloy screws.”

The FDA also wrote, “When used with anchors only the zero plate may be used and the assembly is intended for use with additional supplemental fixation that has been cleared by the FDA for use in the lumbar spine.”

Additionally, hyperlordotic interbody devices (>20° lordosis), oblique interbody devices, and the device must be used with “supplemental fixation (e.g. posterior fixation) that has been cleared by the FDA for use in the lumbar spine.” The spacer “may only be used with titanium alloy screws.”

A device must be substantially equivalent to a predicate device to qualify for 510(k) clearance. The primary predicate device is an anterior lumbar interbody fusion system by the same company who submitted the 510(k) document.

Astura Medical, a spine technology company based in Irving, Texas, submitted the device for 510(k) clearance. According to Astura, the El Capitan X Expandable Anterior Lumbar Interbody System “provides a complete range of expandable anatomic spacers and fixation options with infinitely adjustable expansions in height and lordosis up to 30° for a unique, patient-specific solution.”

Astura Medical Co-founder and Vice President Thomas Purcell said, “The approval of El Capitan X represents a new benchmark for what’s possible in the anterior lumbar fusion marketplace.”

Thomas Purcell continued, “By becoming the first and only system to combine integrated plate and spacer options, along with customizable expandable interbody capabilities, the system delivers on our goal of providing more intraoperative flexibility and versatility than any other ALIF system on the market. El Capitan X is redefining what it means to deliver a truly patient-specific solution.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy