LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Sports Medicine/Faster Pitch Velocity Creates Higher Risk of Elbow Injury
Sports Medicine

Faster Pitch Velocity Creates Higher Risk of Elbow Injury

February 2, 2023 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Faster Pitch Velocity Creates Higher Risk of Elbow Injury
Source: Unsplash and Jose Francisco Morales
Secondary#baseballpitcher#elbowinjury#pitchvelocity

Professional baseball pitchers with faster pitch velocity were linked to a highest risk of elbow injury and subsequent ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in a new study.

The study, “Increased Pitch Velocity is Associated with Throwing Arm Kinetics, Injury Risk, and Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Adolescent, Collegiate, and Professional Baseball Pitchers: A Qualitative Systematic Review,” was published online on January 14, 2023, in the journal Arthroscopy.

This study, which was conducted by research teams at Monmouth Medical Center, Princeton University, Thomas Jefferson School of Medicine, The Rothman Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine and the Hospital for Special Surgery, collected data which mapped out the relationship between pitch velocity and throwing arm kinetics, injury, and ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction.

The study subjects were high school, college, and professional baseball pitchers. The multi-center research team collected Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed and OVID data.

In total, the team found 24 relevant studies which provided data for 2,896 pitchers.

Based on intergroup analysis, the team documented that pitch velocity was significantly correlated with elbow varus torque in high school (R = 0.36), collegiate (R = 0.29), and professional (R =0.076) pitchers.

Elbow distraction force was positively associated with ball velocity in inter-pitcher analyses of high school (R =0.373), professional (R =0.175), and mixed cohort evaluations (R =0.624).

Intragroup analysis also showed a strong association between pitch velocity and elbow varus torque (R =0.922-0.957) and elbow distraction force (R =0.910) in professional pitchers. The researchers also found that faster ball velocity was positively associated with a history of throwing arm injury (R =0.194) in non-adult pitchers.

Advertisement

In addition, the team also observed a positive association between the need for ulnar collateral reconstruction and pitch velocity (R =0.036) in professional pitchers.

“Professional baseball pitchers with faster pitch velocity may be at the highest risk of elbow injury and subsequent ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction, potentially through the mechanism of increased distractive forces on the medial elbow complex,” said the research team in their published study. “When a pitcher ultimately undergoes ulnar collateral reconstruction, decreases in pitching performance are unlikely, but may occur, which should encourage pitchers to caution against maximizing pitch velocity.”


Study authors include Joseph Manzi, BS, and Jacob Zeitlin, BS of the Weill Cornell Medicine in New York, New York and Michelle Kew, Kyle N. Kunze, M.D., Heather Haeberle, M.D., and Joshua S. Dines, M.D. of the Hospital for Special Surgery in New York.

Suleiman Y. Sudan, M.D., of Monmouth Medical Center, Long Branch, New Jersey, Tyler Sandoval of Princeton University in Princeton, New Jersey, Michael C. Ciccotti, M.D. of Rothman Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia, PA and James B. Carr, II, M.D. of the Hospital for Special Surgery Florida in West Palm Beach, Florida, also contributed to the study.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy