LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Debridement Not Recommended for Elbow OCD Lesions
Large Joints and Extremities

Debridement Not Recommended for Elbow OCD Lesions

January 9, 2023 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Debridement Not Recommended for Elbow OCD Lesions
Osteochondritis dissecans of the elbow and synovial osteochondromatosis / Courtesy of Dr. Matt Skalski
Secondary#arthroscopicabridement#elbowocdlesions

Arthroscopic debridement is not the best option to treat grade 3 or grade 4 capitellar osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesions, according to a new study.

The study, “Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes After Arthroscopic Debridement of Grade 3 or 4 Capitellar Osteochondritis Dissecans Lesions,” was published online December 21, 2022, in The American Journal of Sports Medicine.

While arthroscopic debridement for osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the capitellum is a common surgical option, the long-term outcomes are still not the clear, the researchers said.

The Mayo Clinic based team collected data on 53 patients 18 years old or younger who presented with International Cartilage Repair Society grades 3 and 4 and had been treated with arthroscopic debridement. Some of the patients required loose body removal and direct debridement. Marrow stimulation with drilling or microfracture was also performed at the discretion of each surgeon. The team used the Visual Analog Scale for pain, motion, subjective satisfaction, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores, reoperation, and rate of return to sports to rate outcomes.

The median Visual Analog Scale score for pain was 0 at a mean 11 years of follow-up. In addition, 96% of the patients reported being in better condition after the surgery than they were before it. The mean ± SD QuickDASH score was 4 ± 9 points (range, 0-52 points), and the return to sport rate was 80%. The arc of motion significantly improved from 115°± 28° preoperatively to 130°± 17° at latest follow-up (p = .026).

Seven of the elbows required revision surgery for osteochondritis dissecans lesions. Overall survivorship free of revision surgery was 90% (95% CI, 80%-96%) at 5 years and 88% (95% CI, 76%-94%) at 10 years.

“At final follow-up, 7 all-cause reoperations were performed without revision surgery on the OCD lesion,” the researchers wrote.

“Arthroscopic debridement of grade 3 or 4 osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the capitellum produced satisfactory patient-reported outcomes in a majority of elbows, although a subset of patients experienced residual symptoms. The inherent selection bias of our cohort should be considered when applying these results to the overall population with osteochondritis dissecans lesions, as we do not recommend this procedure for all patients.”

Study authors included Daniel C. Austin, M.D., M.S., Bryant Song, B.S., Jorge L. Rojas Lievano, M.D., MSc., Thomas H. Rogers, M.D., Jonathan D. Barlow, M.D., Christopher L. Camp, M.D., Mark E. Morrey, M.D., Joaquin L. Sanchez-Sotelo, M.D., Ph.D., James S. Fitzsimmons, BSc., and Shawn W. O’Driscoll, Ph.D., M.D., all of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy