LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Who (and Why) Risks Dislocation After Hip Arthroplasty?
Large Joints and Extremities

Who (and Why) Risks Dislocation After Hip Arthroplasty?

December 23, 2022 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Who (and Why) Risks Dislocation After Hip Arthroplasty?
Superiorly dislocated hip post trauma / Source: Wikimedia Commons and James Heilman, M.D.
#osteoarthritis#totalhiparthroplastySecondary#hipdislocation

Most postop hip arthroplasty dislocations occur within the first two years of surgery, according to a research team from the Yale School of Medicine. But who is most at risk and why?

The Yale team designed a study to answer that question and their result, “Incidence, Timing, and Predictors of Hip Dislocation After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis,” appears in the November 2022 edition of The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

Study co-author Stephen Gillinov, who is an M.D. Candidate at the Yale School of Medicine, explained the background of the study to OTW, “Hip dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a costly and morbid complication. The true incidence of dislocation after THA in the United States is not known, due to challenges in monitoring and incomplete implementation of the American Joint Replacement Registry.”

“The present study used a large national administrative database to address this gap, by assessing the incidence, timing, and predictors of dislocation after primary THAs performed for osteoarthritis (OA).”

Using 2010 to 2020 data from the PearlDiver MHip database, the study authors looked at patients who underwent primary THA for OA (using a minimum of two years of postoperative data). They found 155,185 primary THAs, 3,630 (2.3%) of which experienced dislocation within two years. They determined that dislocation was associated with younger age (<65), female sex, body mass index <20, higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, cemented prosthesis, and use of metal-on-poly or metal-on-metal implants.

The team noted that their age-related finding is at odds with prior work indicating that an older patient population has been associated with an increased risk of dislocation. They say that the reason for this disparity is not clear, stating, “…but the greater incidence of dislocation in younger patients in this study could result from greater levels of initial postoperative activity or more complex presenting pathology in this specific patient population.”

“Among 155,185 primary THAs,” said Gillinov to OTW, “hip dislocation occurred within two years in 3,630 (2.3%). Among patients who experienced dislocation, 52% of first-time dislocations occurred in the first three months, 57% had more than one, and 11% experienced >5 postoperative dislocation events. Revision surgery was performed within two years of THA in 45.6% of those experiencing dislocation versus 1.8% of those who did not.”

“The 2.3% rate of dislocation that we found falls within the range of previously reported estimates from smaller, prior studies. The high rate of repeat dislocation suggests the need for particular surveillance and counseling for patients with prior episodes of hip instability.”

“Although the incidence of dislocation after THA is relatively low, the high number of THAs performed means that a large number of people are affected by this complication. Understanding the incidence, risk factors, and impact of dislocations within two years of THA should help with patient counseling and establishing treatment pathways.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy