LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Company News/Integra LifeSciences to Acquire Surgical Innovation Associates
Company News

Integra LifeSciences to Acquire Surgical Innovation Associates

December 14, 2022 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Integra LifeSciences to Acquire Surgical Innovation Associates
Courtesy of Integra LifeSciences Holding Corporation and Surgical Innovation Associates
Secondary#implantbasedbreastreconstruction#integralifesciences#surgicalinnovationassociates

Integra LifeSciences Holding Corporation has announced a definitive agreement to acquire Surgical Innovation Associates (SIA), doubling down on cosmetic reconstruction in a deal worth up to $140 million.

The transaction is expected to close by the year’s end, subject to the satisfactions of customary closing conditions. Integra will pay $50 million at closing and may pay up to an additional $90 million upon achieving certain revenue and regulatory milestones.

According to Integra, “the transaction is expected to be dilutive to adjusted earnings per share by approximately $0.06 in Year 1 and accretive to earnings in Year 3, with a return on invested capital greater than 10% by Year 5.” To offset deal dilution Integra “is planning a $150 million share repurchase as a part of a previous approval by the board of directors.”

The acquisition aligns with Integra’s focus on expanding in the cosmetic reconstruction market in the United States with FDA-approved devices. Currently, there are no FDA-approved surgical matrices for use specifically cosmetic reconstruction.

SIA is the creator of DuraSorb®, a fully resorbable synthetic matrix for use in reconstructive and aesthetic surgery. Currently, SIA is “conducting an investigational device exemption study in the U.S. evaluating the safety and effectiveness of DuraSorb with the goal of obtaining a PMA [a pre-market approval] in IBBR [implant-based breast reconstruction].”

Integra’s plastic and reconstructive surgery portfolio includes SurgiMend® PRS. SurgiMend is a xenograft surgical matrix and, according to the company, will be the first surgical matrix for use as soft tissue support in IBBR submitted under the pre-market approval (PMA) process.

Integra LifeSciences’ Executive Vice President and President, Tissue Technologies Robert T. Davis, Jr. commented, “By offering two distinct product solutions, SurgiMend and DuraSorb, to plastic and reconstructive surgeons, we aim to address various clinical, contracting, and economic needs across different sites of care. We look forward to welcoming the SIA leadership and colleagues who will continue to drive the team’s success.”

According to the press release, “2022 revenue for DuraSorb is expected to be approximately $5 million.” According to Wells Fargo Securities, LLC analysts, Integra “expects that revenues could double in 2023.”

Wells Fargo analysts also stated that Integra “expects a first-mover advantage in IBBR as SurgiMend will likely be the first product with a PMA (sub-pectoral), and DuraSorb is likely to be the second product with a PMA (sub-pectoral and pre-pectoral) as no other companies have submitted a PMA for IBBR to date.” Additionally, “both xenograft ADMs [acellular dermal matrices] (SurgiMend) and resorbable synthetic meshes (DuraSorb) are lower priced than human ADMs, and the company believes that the market will shift away from higher priced human ADMs over time.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy