LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/New Harvard Study Tests the Proposition: Garbage In, Garbage Out
Spine

New Harvard Study Tests the Proposition: Garbage In, Garbage Out

October 25, 2022 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

New Harvard Study Tests the Proposition: Garbage In, Garbage Out
Source: Wikimedia commons and Pan European Game Commission
Secondary#patientreportedoutcomes#garbageingarbageout

How vital is a completed patient reported outcome form? This new Harvard Medical School study found evidence that it is much more important than previously thought and has a documented bearing on patient outcomes.

The new study, “Sociodemographic Factors Are Associated with Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Completion in Orthopaedic Surgery: An Analysis of Completion Rates and Determinants Among New Patients,” appears in the August 4, 2022, edition of The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery: Open Access.

Co-author Daniel G. Tobert, M.D., an orthopedic spine surgeon and assistant professor at Harvard Medical School, told OTW, “We are interested in this topic because PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) is a patient-reported outcome measure that is increasingly being utilized for clinical care, research, and administrative purposes. Therefore, much of the treatment plans, research results, and healthcare policies that utilize PROMIS will be based on the patients that actually complete the questionnaires. For any results to be applicable to our society, it must be reflective of our society as well.”

Flawed, incomplete or outright biased patient reported outcome forms at the front end could affect treatment plans and much more on the back end.

Garbage In, Garbage Out

To test this hypothesis, the Harvard team designed a study using data from every new orthopedic patient treated at one academic medical center from 2016 to 2020. Depending on subspecialty and presenting condition, patients were assigned various PROMIS forms and legacy PROMs. The team then also collected demographic and clinical information from each patient’s electronic medical record.

In total, the study was able to collect data from 40% (88,052 of 219.891 patients) of the PROMS forms.

“Non-English-speaking patients had a 90% increased likelihood of not completing assigned PROMs at presentation,” wrote the authors. “Older patients (≥65 years of age) and patients of Black race had a 23% and 24% increased likelihood of not completing assigned PROMs, respectively.”

Advertisement

Opting Out Means Being Left Out

“We analyzed the variables that were available with these data, which include age, sex, race, primary language, marital status, insurance status, and others,” Dr. Tobert told OTW. “Patients that are older, those that are less technologically engaged, non-English speakers, and certain race categories are less likely to fill out PROMIS questionnaires. This means their responses are underrepresented in orthopedic research and it risks excluding their input into future policy initiatives.”

“Research that utilizes PROMIS should include information about the cohort that filled out the questionnaires but also those that were eligible but did not complete the questionnaires,” added Dr. Tobert. “More importantly, efforts should be made to engage patients at risk for not completing the forms to create a more equal representation of the patient population.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy