LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/How Fast or Accurate Is Screw Placement Using Augmented Reality?
Spine

How Fast or Accurate Is Screw Placement Using Augmented Reality?

October 4, 2022 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

How Fast or Accurate Is Screw Placement Using Augmented Reality?
Courtesy of Lumus
Secondary#pediclescrewplacement#augmentedreality

A new Rush University Medical Center study has collected data regarding the effects of using Augmented Reality tools as an adjunct to pedicle screw placement during surgery.

The study, “Augmented Reality in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: Early Efficiency and Complications of Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Instrumentation,” was published on September 28, 2022 in The Spine Journal.

“In general, pedicle screw accuracy rates have improved with increasingly use of technology with navigation-based instrumentation described as accurate in 89-100% of cases. Emerging Augmented Reality technology in spine surgery builds upon current spinal navigation to provide three-dimensional imaging of the spine and powerfully reduce the impact of inherent ergonomic and efficiency difficulties,” the researchers wrote.

Augmented Reality systems typically feature a wireless headset with transparent near-eye display which projects intra-operative 3D imaging directly onto the surgeon’s retina.

To study the effectives of Augmented Reality, three senior surgeons at two institutions used it for the placement of percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation with spinal navigation in 164 total minimally invasive surgeries.

One hundred and fifty-five of the procedures were performed for degenerative pathology, 6 for tumor and 3 for spinal deformity. A total of 606 pedicle screws were placed, 590 in the lumbar spine and 16 in the thoracic spine.

The researchers analyzed patient demographics, surgical metrics including total posterior construct time, clinical complications, and instrumentation revision rates.

The time elapsed from registration and percutaneous approach to final screw placement averaged 3 minutes and 54 seconds per screw. Surgical times were similar for both the early and later cases when the surgeons had more experience with the system. None of the instrumentation needed to be revised for either clinical or radiographic complications at a follow-up ranging from 6-24 months.

Advertisement

A total of 3 screws were replaced intra-operatively, the researchers noted, and no radiculopathy or neurologic deficit postoperatively was reported.

The researchers noted that this is the first report of the use of Augmented Reality for placement of spinal pedicle screws using minimally invasive surgery, and that it confirms the efficiency and safety of using the technology for these procedures.

The study authors included Alexander J. Butler, M.D., Matthew Colman, M.D., and Frank M. Philips, M.D., all of Rush University Medical Center in Chicago, Illinois. James Lynch, M.D., of Spine Nevada, Reno, Nevada also contributed to the study.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy