LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/High Glycemic Variability=2x Greater Risk for Complications?
Large Joints and Extremities

High Glycemic Variability=2x Greater Risk for Complications?

October 26, 2022 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

High Glycemic Variability=2x Greater Risk for Complications?
Source: PxHere
#totalhiparthroplastySecondary#asepticrevision#glycemicvariability

What, if any, is the association between postoperative glycemic variability and adverse outcomes following aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty?

New study, “Serum Glucose Variability Increases the Risk of Complications Following Aseptic Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty,” appears in the September 21, 2022, edition of The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American).

Lead author Graham Goh, M.D., an orthopedic surgery resident at Boston University Medical Center, told OTW, “Increased glucose variability has been recognized as a risk factor for perioperative complications and infection following primary total joint arthroplasty (Shohat et al. JBJS 2018).”

“This glycemic marker has also been linked to higher rates of treatment failure and reinfection following 2-stage exchange arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection (Wang et al. JOA 2020). Nevertheless, current literature on the impact of higher glucose variability in revision total hip arthroplasty remains limited.”

Armed with data from the Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia, the team reviewed information for 1,983 patients who had undergone aseptic revision total joint arthroplasty (636 knee arthroplasties and 1,347 hip arthroplasties) from 2001 to 2019.

They found that patients with high glycemic variability were at 1.7 times greater risk for 90-day complications and 2 times greater risk for periprosthetic joint infection at a minimum 1-year follow-up.

The risk of 90-day complications increased by 2.2% and the risk of periprosthetic joint infection increased by 1.8% for every percentage-point increase in COV [coefficient of variation]. Patients with higher glucose variability also had a longer length of stay. These associations were independent of age, sex, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, involved joint, operative time, history of diabetes, and mean glucose levels.

We asked if hospital should have a standardized preop period during which they monitor glucose levels and Dr. Goh said, “Our results show that there is a strong independent association between high glucose variability and an increased risk of complications after revision total hip arthroplasty. However, due to the retrospective nature of our study, we cannot make specific recommendations regarding the effectiveness of standardized glucose monitoring in the perioperative period.”

“It is encouraging to note that several clinical trials investigating the efficacy of continuous glucose monitoring devices in perioperative blood glucose monitoring following total hip arthroplasty are currently ongoing, one of which has been recently funded by the Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation. Furthermore, even if a strong association is once again demonstrated upon completion of these prospective trials, we believe that interventional trials documenting the efficacy of reducing glucose variability in mitigating these complications need to be conducted prior to the widespread adoption of continuous glucose monitoring devices in arthroplasty care.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy