Error-free, complication free knee arthroplasty is the objective, of course. Does computer assistance improve the rates of error-free and complication-free surgery? A new study from the Medical College of Wisconsin collected data on this subject and their work, “Revisiting Short-term Outcomes of Conventional and Computer-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Population-based Study,” appears in the June 22, 2022, edition of the Journal of the AAOS: Global Research and Reviews.
Knee Surgery Complication Rates: Free-Hand vs. Computer-Assisted
Co-author Abdalrahman Ahmed, B.S., a student at the Medical College of Wisconsin, provided a background to this research to OTW. “Prior to this study, the population-based studies in the literature providing insight on the advantages of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) over conventional total knee arthroplasty were outdated. Moreover, the more recent institution-based studies have relatively small sample sizes and thus may impede wide-scale adoption of this technology.”
“The aim of this study was to compare postoperative computer-assisted TKA and TKA in-hospital complications and 90-day all-cause readmissions using data from 2017-2018. To our knowledge this is the first study to analyze and provide insight on the complication rates of TKAs and computer-assisted TKAs in recent years. We hope this more recent insight on the postoperative outcomes of computer-assisted TKA will shift the paradigm toward greater acceptance of its benefits and drive wide-spread adoption.”
A retrospective study with data from the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System, this research included patients older than 45 years who had undergone a primary unilateral TKA or computer-assisted TKA.
As far as the definition of an in-hospital complication, the researchers used the 2020 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services risk-standardized total hip arthroplasty/TKA complications measure. The database used allowed for tracking of patient readmissions in New York State, thus readmissions within a 90-day period of discharge were able to be analyzed. During the study timeframe, 80,468 TKAs were performed in New York—7,395 (9.2%) of those were computer-assisted TKAs.
“Patients who had computer-assisted TKA had significantly fewer complications compared to patients that underwent conventional TKAs (0.4% of total computer-assisted TKAs vs 2.6% of total conventional TKAs, P < 0.001),” said Ahmed to OTW.
“Additionally, patients who had computer-assisted TKAs had fewer 90-day all-cause readmissions compared to those who underwent conventional TKAs (363 vs 4,169 revisits, P < 0.01). Although computer assistance was associated with significantly lower odds of in-hospital complications (odds ratio, 0.15, 95% confidence interval, 0.09 to 0.24; P < 0.05), 90-day all-cause readmissions were not found to be associated with lower odds.”
“In a prior study we showed that the majority of TKAs are still done conventionally. Our updated population-based findings that showed favorable outcomes for patients that underwent computer-assisted TKA should encourage wider adoption of the technology. Our findings may also help hospitals decrease their expenses under a bundled payment model.”

Discussion
This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?
Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.
We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.
Join the conversation
Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.