LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/Depression Increases Revision Surgery Odds 16x
Spine

Depression Increases Revision Surgery Odds 16x

September 23, 2022 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Depression Increases Revision Surgery Odds 16x
Source: Pixabay and Ryan McGuire
#patientreportedoutcomes#depression#visualanalogscores

Patients with a history of depression and/or anxiety who undergo posterior cervical decompression and fusion have a significantly more difficult, indeed up to 16x more difficult, road to recovery than other patients, a new study finds.

As a pre-existing condition, depression and anxiety increase spine surgery revision rates, this new work from the Rothman Institute concludes. The study, “Depression Increases Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion Revision Rates and Diminishes Neck Disability Index,” was published online on September 15, 2022 in the journal Spine.

“Mental health diagnoses are receiving increased recognition for their influence of outcomes after spine surgery. The magnitude that mental health disorders contribute to patient-reported outcomes following posterior cervical decompression and fusion requires increased awareness and understanding,” the researchers wrote.

For the retrospective cohort study, the research team investigated the ways in which depression and anxiety can affect patient-reported outcome measures after the spine surgery. The Rothman based group collected data from electronic medical records of patients who’d been treated for back pain with posterior cervical decompression and fusion during the years 2013 to 2020. All the patients in the study were treated at the Rothman Institute in Philadelphia.

Patients were then categorized by the research team into either a depression/anxiety group or a non-depression/anxiety group based on their medical history.

Of the 195 patients included in the study 60 had a prior diagnosis of depression or anxiety. These patients tended to be slightly younger (58.8 years of age vs. 63.0; p = 0.012) and almost 2-to-1 female (53.3% vs. 31.9%; p = 0.007).

And when it came to recovery after the surgery, patients with a prior diagnosis of depression or anxiety were nearly 16x more likely to require a revision surgery (11.7% vs. 0.74%; p = 0.001) and had significantly worse postoperative neck disability index (40.7 vs. 28.5; p = 0.001) and postoperative Visual Analog Scale Neck scores (3.63 vs. 2.48; p = 0.018).

Patients with a history of depression also registered a slightly worse baseline mental component (MCS-12) (42.2 vs. 48.6; p < 0.001) and postoperative MCS-12 (46.5 vs. 52.9; p = 0.002).

Advertisement

By contrast, patients in the non-depression/anxiety group registered an improved MCS-12 score (p = 0.002) and neck disability index (p < 0.001) postoperatively.

The research team (see below) discovered that depression and/or anxiety was an independent predictor of decreased magnitude of neck disability index improvement on regression analysis (β = 7.14; p = 0.038).

“Patients with history of depression or anxiety demonstrate less improvement in patient-reported outcomes and a higher revision rate after posterior cervical fusion, highlighting the importance of mental health on clinical outcomes after spine surgery,” they wrote.

Study authors include Gregory R. Toci, B.S., Mark J. Lambrechts, M.D., Brian A. Karamian, M.D., Shivang Bhatt, B.S., Daria Harlamova, B.S., Jose A., Canseco, M.D., Ph.D., Ian David Kaye, M.D., Barrett I. Woods, M.D., Alan S. Hilibrand, M.D., Christopher K. Kepler, M.D., M.B.A., Alexander R. Vaccaro, M.D., Ph.D., Gregory D. Schroeder, M.D., from Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia, PA.  Jennifer Mao, B.S., M.B.A and Jeremy Heinle, B.S., from the Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine in Philadelphia also contributed to the study.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy