LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Using Data to Predict Adverse TKA Events in Parkinson’s Patients
Large Joints and Extremities

Using Data to Predict Adverse TKA Events in Parkinson’s Patients

August 10, 2022 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

#totalkneearthroplasty#totaljointarthroplastySecondary#parkinsonsdisease

A recent retrospective study looked at 558,371 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients—3,082 with Parkinson’s Disease and 555,289 without the condition. Their work, “Complications During the Hospital Stay, Length of Stay, and Cost of Care in Parkinson Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Propensity Matched Database Study,” appears in the July 8, 2022, edition of the Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research & Reviews.

Study co-author, Naga Suresh Cheppalli, M.D., an orthopedic surgeon at the University of New Mexico School of Medicine, explained the genesis of this study to OTW, “With the introduction of outpatient total joint care, bundled payment, and enhanced recovery pathways following joint replacement, it is quite important for surgeons and patients to choose the correct setting for surgery and post-operative care. Reducing the cost drivers and avoiding complications with successful outcomes is the current goal of joint arthroplasty in the era of bundled care payment pathways.”

“In the future, we anticipate a significantly increased number of TKA in patients suffering from Parkinson’s Disease. This study data helps surgeons and patients predict their complications while they are in the hospital and choose the setting of their care.”

“Our team found an increased incidence of complications such as acute blood loss anemia, periprosthetic mechanical complications, and increased COS [cost of care], but no difference in length of stay (LOS) was noted in patients undergoing TKA with Parkinson’s Disease,” stated Dr. Cheppalli to OTW. “This information can be useful to make an informed decision regarding patient care and the preferred healthcare setup for TKA in patients with Parkinson’s Disease.”

Specifically, the incidence rate of blood loss anemia in the Parkinson’s group was 22.3% versus 13.5% in the control group of 13.5%; the incidence rate of periprosthetic dislocations was 1.5% in the Parkinson’s group versus 0.4% in the control group; and, finally, the incidence rates of periprosthetic mechanical complications including but not limited to periprosthetic fractures, knee dislocations, patellar maltracking, and subluxations was 1.1% in the Parkinson’s group versus 0.6% in the control group.

A True Patient Champion and Lessons Learned

According to Cheppalli, “This study gave me insights regarding the complication profile and cost of care associated with joint arthroplasty in patients with Parkinson’s Disease. Using this information, I will be more prepared to tackle those specific problems like having blood available in the immediate post-operative period (increased incidence of acute blood loss anemia) and having constrained implants available (to avoid mechanical complications).”

“Patients with Parkinson’s Disease are a special group of total joint arthroplasty patients and their cost of care can be higher. I negotiate with insurance for an additional payment plan (other than being covered in bundled care plan) while taking care of medically complex patients. With the mandatory bundled payments, there are no provisions for this kind of additional reimbursement, there is a risk that these patients could be deprived of the benefits of life-improving surgeries like TKA.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy