LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Grinding/Clicking Knees Versus Catching/Locking Knees
Large Joints and Extremities

Grinding/Clicking Knees Versus Catching/Locking Knees

August 19, 2022 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

#totalkneearthroplasty#osteoarthritisSecondary#cartilagedisease

A Brigham and Women’s Hospital research team took a hard look at knee arthroscopy as a treatment for some of the most common patient-reported problems—grinding, clicking, catching, locking, and painful knees which are, ultimately, diagnosed as degenerative meniscal tears. Their work, “Grinding, Clicking, and Pivot Pain Resolve in Most Patients After Knee Arthroscopy,” was published in the July 12, 2022, edition of Arthroscopy.

Elizabeth Matzkin, M.D., chief of Women’s Sports Medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, associate professor at Harvard Medical School and co-author, explained the purpose and genesis of the study to  OTW. “Knee arthroscopy is a commonly performed surgery to treat both symptomatic meniscal tears and a constellation of knee symptoms related to cartilage disease and early osteoarthritis.”

“Our recent prospective study evaluating the etiology of these patient reported knee symptoms found that they are driven primarily by both the severity and number of compartments with focal cartilage lesions rather than meniscal tear.”

“To evaluate the therapeutic benefit of knee arthroscopy in response to the aforementioned study, in this current study we looked to evaluate resolution of knee symptoms following knee arthroscopy, clinical and demographic factors that predict symptom persistence, and overall patient-reported outcomes using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score questionnaire.”

Using data from 584 patients who underwent knee arthroscopy from August 2012 to December 2019 (one surgeon), the researchers assessed information on frequency of knee grinding/clicking, catching/locking, and/or pivot pain preoperatively and one and two years postoperatively.

“Postoperative knee symptom resolution was more likely for the grinding/clicking and pivot pain symptom domains than for the catching/locking symptom domain at all postoperative timepoints,” explained Dr. Matzkin to OTW.

“Clinical and demographic factors, including smoking status, overweight/obesity, absence of meniscal tear, and increased number of compartments with focal chondral lesions predicted persistence of patient reported knee symptoms. Lastly, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales consistently improved postoperatively, with a twofold improvement in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales for those whose symptoms resolved compared to those with persistent symptoms.”

“The results of the current study demonstrate utility in knee arthroscopy for patients with preoperative ‘meniscal’ and ‘mechanical’ knee with four out of five patients having clinically significant improvement (Minimal Clinically Important Differences >8) for Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score pain activities of daily living and quality of life.”

“This study supports symptom improvement after knee arthroscopy for patients with meniscal tears and focal cartilage lesions resulting in grinding and clicking. Patients with catching, locking and pivot pain may experience persistence of symptoms which was also noted in smokers, overweight patients, and more compartments with focal cartilage lesions.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy