LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Sports Medicine/Suture Tape Augmentation Speeds Up UCLR Recovery
Sports Medicine

Suture Tape Augmentation Speeds Up UCLR Recovery

July 12, 2022 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Secondary#returntosportrehabilitation#suturetapeaugmentation#ulnarcollateralreconstruction

Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) with suture tape augmentation adds strength and speeds up rehab for athletes, a new study finds.

The study, “Biomechanical Comparison of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Suture Augmentation,” was published online on June 20, 2022 in The American Journal of Sports Medicine.

“A common concern associated with elbow ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction is the amount of time required for recovery and rehabilitation. For example, for Major League pitchers, the average time to return to competition ranges from 13.8 to 20.5 months,” the researchers wrote.

“Suture tape augmentation has shown the ability to provide additional soft tissue stability across other joints in the body. By providing an additional checkrein to the UCL reconstruction while the graft is healing, it may be possible to accelerate the rehabilitation process in overhead athletes and thus effect a quicker return to sports.”

Using 24 fresh-frozen cadaveric elbows, the researchers compared elbow valgus stability and load to failure between UCL reconstruction with and without suture tape augmentation.

First, medial elbow stability was tested with the UCL intact, deficient, and reconstructed using the 3-strand docking technique with or without suture augmentation. Then a 3-N m valgus torque was applied to the elbow and valgus rotation of the ulna was recorded via motion-tracking cameras. The reconstructed specimens were also loaded to failure at 70° of elbow flexion.

The UCL-deficient elbows had greater valgus rotation compared with intact and internally braced reconstructed elbows at every angle of flexion tested and also when compared with unbraced UCL-reconstructed elbows at 50° to 120° of flexion (p < .05).

The researchers discovered no significant differences between intact and UCL-reconstructed elbows with and without suture augmentation at any flexion angle tested. When loaded to failure, the unbraced reconstructed elbows failed at a significantly lower torque as compared with elbows with UCL reconstruction with suture tape augmentation (p < .01).

Advertisement

“In this cadaveric model, 3-strand UCL reconstruction with suture augmentation did not over constrain the elbow throughout all flexion angles when compared with the native state and UCL reconstruction alone, while providing greater load to failure.,” they explained.

Study authors included Michael V. Narvaez, M.D., Trevor J. Nelson, B.S., Keon Youssefzadeh, B.S., Orr Limpisvasti, M.D., and Melodie F. Metzger, Ph.D., all of Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, California.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy