LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Foot & Ankle/Reducing Infection Risk for Achilles Open Repair
Foot & Ankle

Reducing Infection Risk for Achilles Open Repair

July 20, 2022 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Secondary#achillesopenrepair#posteriorcruralfasciotomy

Posterior crural fasciotomy is more effective at reducing post-operative surgical site infection rates than inserted vacuum suction drainage in open Achilles tendon repair surgery, according to a new study.

The study, “The Efficacy of Posterior Fasciotomy Versus Inserted Vacuum Drainage in Reducing Post-operative Surgical Site Infection in Open Achilles Tendon Repair: A Prospective Cohort Study with Inverse Probability Treatment Weight Propensity Score Analysis,” was published online on June 30, 2022 in The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery.

Traditional open surgical repair offers excellent functional outcomes, and when performed with proper technique and layered closure, the risk of infection is small.

This new study compares post-operative surgical site-infection rates for patients who’ve been treated with a posterior crural fasciotomy, but without vacuum suction drainage and patients who’ve had the same treatment, but with vacuum suction drainage.

The prospective, single-centered study was designed and conducted at a tertiary referral hospital between January 2017 and January 2020. The surgeries themselves were performed by one of two surgeons.

The research team set the primary outcome to be measured as surgical site-infection rate. They also, as secondary outcomes, collected Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score, Functional Foot Index, and Visual Analogue Scale.

The research team enrolled 60 patients who were split between the two groups. Of the 60 patients, 2 in the posterior crural fasciotomy group and 5 in the vacuum suction drainage group experienced post-operative surgical site-infection (crude RR: 0.40 (95% CI 0.08, 1.90); p = 0.228).

Using an Inverse-Probability-Treatment-Weighted Propensity Score Analysis, the researchers found that the posterior crural fasciotomy group had a lower surgical site-infection rate than the vacuum suction drainage group (adjusted RR 0.30(95% CI 0.01, 0.91); p = 0.033).

Advertisement

The team also found that the Inverse-Probability-Treatment-Weighted Propensity Score Analysis of Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score along with crude analysis of total Functional Foot Index and Visual Analogue Scale were also significantly better in the posterior crural fasciotomy group than the inserted vacuum drainage group (p < 0.05).

In conclusion, the researchers found evidence that Achilles repair was associated with a significant reduction in post-operative surgical-site-infection rate compared to vacuum suction drainage group, according to all the data.

Study authors included Pissanu Reingrittha, M.D., Krianokamol Beniawongsathien, M.D., and Surawit Visuthisakchai, M.D., all of Buddhachinaraj Hospital in Phitsanulok, Thailand.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy