LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Do Randomized Controlled Study Patients Resemble Actual Patients?
Large Joints and Extremities

Do Randomized Controlled Study Patients Resemble Actual Patients?

July 18, 2022 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

#totaljointarthroplastySecondary#randomizedcontrolledtrial

Are the people who take part in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the total joint arthroplasty (TJA) realm truly representative of those who undergo TJA?

This was the question that a team from Weill Cornell Medicine and Hospital for Special Surgery in New York recently tackled in their work, “Characterization and Potential Relevance of Randomized Controlled Trial Patient Populations in Total Joint Arthroplasty in the United States: A Systematic Review,” published in the June 20, 2022 edition of The Journal of Arthroplasty.

“A substantial number of RCT studies in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) are published each year,” said co-author Jonathan S. Yu, a medical student at Weill Cornell. “However, it was unknown how closely the demographic characteristics of TJA RCT cohorts resemble that of the U.S. patient population undergoing TJA. We felt that an assessment of this cohort could be helpful for future RCTs.”

Using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the researchers investigated only RCTs published in 2018 or later (U.S. only). They included 153 RCTs in the systematic review.

The breakdown was as follows: 98 TKA-only studies, 33 THA-only studies, and 22 TKA and THA studies. The total number of patients in the 153 RCTs was 24,135 patients (13,298 in TKA-only studies and 4,589 in THA-only studies).

The investigators aggregated patient demographics and then compared them against demographics characteristics from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality National Inpatient Sample and American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program patient cohorts.

The demographics included in the study were sample size, age, sex, body mass index, ethnicity, smoking, diabetes mellitus, Charlson Comorbidity Index, work status, income, living alone, dependence on others, and caregiver.

Clinical care not at risk?

Advertisement

The team found that the average age of patients in the TJA RCT group was 65 years (53-80) while the National Inpatient Sample group was 67 years (18-90). The average body mass index of the TJA RCT cohort was 30.8 (18.2-37.6) while the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program cohort was 31.9 (14.1-59.6).

“Overall,” stated Jonathan Yu to OTW, “the U.S. RCT patient cohort for TJA does not differ substantially from the general patient population undergoing TJA in the United States. Differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between the TJA RCT cohort and database cohorts ranged from minimal to small, suggesting that these differences are unlikely to impact clinical outcomes.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy