LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/General vs. Spinal Anesthesia in Hip Fractures. Which Wins?
Large Joints and Extremities

General vs. Spinal Anesthesia in Hip Fractures. Which Wins?

June 22, 2022 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Secondary#generalanesthesia#spinalanesthesia

According to a team of researchers at the Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care at the University of Pennsylvania’s Perelman School of Medicine, we don’t know enough about general vs. spinal anesthesia for hip fracture patients. So, of course, they put together a randomized study and collected post-op pain data for 1,600 hip fracture patients at 46 hospitals around the US and Canada.

The details of their study and results were published in the June 14, 2022, edition of the Annals of Internal Medicine under the title, “Pain, Analgesic Use, and Patient Satisfaction With Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Hip Fracture Surgery.”

Mark D. Neuman, M.D., M.Sc., co-author and a member of the Perelman School of Medicine’s Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care explained to OTW the genesis of this important study. “Spinal and general anesthesia have each been used in orthopedic surgery for decades, yet most past trials have not examined differences in patients’ experience of pain and satisfaction with care. Our study aimed to fill that gap in order to improve decision-making by patients and clinicians about their anesthesia choices.”

Neuman and his colleagues around the U.S. and Canada enrolled 1,600 patients in this, a “pre-planned secondary analysis of a multicenter pragmatic randomized trial comparing spinal versus general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery.”

The team pulled data from ER registration lists, hospital admission lists, and surgical case schedules at 46 hospitals. The team selected patients who were 50 years or older and were scheduled to undergo surgical repair of a clinically or radiographically diagnosed femoral neck, intertrochanteric, or subtrochanteric hip fracture.

Patients in the spinal anesthesia group (795) received one spinal anesthetic with sedation and were allowed to be converted by their care team to general anesthesia if required based on clinical circumstances or patient request. Patients in the general anesthesia group (805) received an inhaled anesthesia and an endotracheal tube, supraglottic airway, or other device for airway management.

Results: Mega Pain at 24 Hours, Spinal Worse Than General

“Most importantly,” explained Dr. Neuman to OTW, “we found that severe pain is common after hip fracture—over 73% of patients in our sample rated their worst pain over the first 24 hours after surgery as severe. We also found that spinal anesthesia was associated with more pain in the first 24 hours after surgery and more prescription analgesic use at 60 days compared to general anesthesia, although satisfaction was similar across groups.”

“Most of all, our hope is that this information can help to improve discussions between patients and physicians regarding anesthesia choices. Our work highlights a need for further research to validate our findings and explore the relationship between anesthesia technique, postoperative pain management, and patterns of analgesic use after hip fracture surgery.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy