LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Key Risk Factor for Rotator Cuff Retear Identified
Large Joints and Extremities

Key Risk Factor for Rotator Cuff Retear Identified

May 5, 2022 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Secondary#acromiongreatertuberosityimpingementindex#rotatorcuffretearrates

A high acromion-greater tuberosity impingement index increases the risk of retear after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, a new study finds.

The study, “A high acromion-greater tuberosity impingement index increases the risk of retear after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair,” was published online on April 18, 2022 in the Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery.

“No evaluation has been done on the relationship of the acromion-greater tuberosity impingement index with retear after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Our purpose was to evaluate whether a higher acromion-greater tuberosity impingement index is associated with retear after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair,” the researchers wrote.

One hundred and thirty-two patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were checked by the research team using an MRI scan at a one year follow-up to check tendon healing. All findings were graded no retear, partial-thickness retear or full-thickness retear.

The acromion-greater tuberosity impingement index, the critical shoulder angle, acromion index and lateral acromial angle were all measured with postoperative radiographs.

Postoperative Constant scores and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores were different across all groups, with inferior outcomes in the full-thickness retear group (p < 0.05 for all). The University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder Score was improved more in the no retear group as compared with the partial-thickness retear and the full-thickness retear groups (p < 0.05), and in the partial-thickness retear group compared with the full-thickness group (p < 0.05).

For high acromion-greater tuberosity impingement index and critical shoulder angle, the values of the partial-thickness and full-thickness retear groups were larger than the no retear group (p < 0.05 for all); however, there were no significant differences between the partial retear and full retear groups.

The researchers also observed no significant differences with regard to the acromion index or the lateral acromial angle. In addition, the repair integrity was positively related to the acromion-greater tuberosity impingement index (0.304, p < 0.05) and critical shoulder angle (0.252, p < 0.05), but not related to the acromion index or the lateral acromial angle. The acromion-greater tuberosity impingement index was not related to any functional scores (p > 0.05 for all).

Advertisement

“This study revealed that the acromion-greater tuberosity impingement index was positively related to rotator cuff retear. Patients with retears had significantly greater acromion-greater tuberosity impingement index scores after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair,” the researchers wrote.

Study authors included Linghui Xie, B.S., of Wenzhou Seventh Hospital in China, Xinxian Xu, M.S., of The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children’s Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University in China, Baoxiang Ma, B.S., of Wenzhou Seventh Hospital in China and Haixiao Liu, Ph.D., of The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children’s Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University in China.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy