LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Arthroscopic Intervention for FAI, How Successful in Athletes?
Large Joints and Extremities

Arthroscopic Intervention for FAI, How Successful in Athletes?

May 6, 2022 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Secondary#returntosport#hiparthroscopy#intrabursalfractionallengthening

How successful is arthroscopic intervention as treatment for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and painful internal snapping as a strategy for returning athletes to competitive activity? A new study provides evidence that competitive athletes can, indeed, return to sport after being treated arthroscopically with intrabursal iliopsoas fractional lengthening.

The study, “Competitive Athletes with Femoroacetabular Impingement and Painful Internal Snapping Treated Arthroscopically with Intrabursal Iliopsoas Fractional Lengthening: High Rate of Return to Sport and Favorable Midterm Functional Outcomes,” was published online on April 19, 2022, in The American Journal of Sports Medicine.

“Athletes with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome who undergo hip arthroscopy with iliopsoas fractional lengthening in the context of painful internal snapping have demonstrated favorable patient-reported outcomes, return to sport, and resolution of internal snapping symptoms at short term follow-up. Midterm outcomes have not been established,” the team from the American Hip Research Foundation wrote.

For this study, the research team collected 5-year patient-reported outcomes and return-to-sport data for competitive athletes who had been treated with primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and intrabursal iliopsoas fractional lengthening.

They then compared their outcomes to a control group of athletes who had hip arthroscopy, but without painful internal snapping and iliopsoas fractional lengthening.

All the arthroscopies were performed by a single surgeon between February 2010 and December 2013. Patients were either a professional, collegiate, or high school athlete who had a minimum of 5 years of follow-up scores for the modified Harris Hip Score, Nonarthritic Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score-Sport Specific Subscale, and Visual Analog Scale for pain.

Overall, there were 105 competitive athletes included in the iliopsoas fractional lengthening group. They all had a follow-up of 66.8 ± 6.9 months. They all showed significant improvement in all patient-reported outcomes at a minimum 5-year follow-up (p < .001).

They also had favorable rates of achieving the minimal clinically importance difference for the modified Harris Hip Score (82.0%), Nonarthritic Hip Score (85.4%), and Hip Outcome Score-Sport Specific Subscale (82.8%).

Advertisement

Almost 90% of the athletes in the iliopsoas fractional lengthening group successfully returned to sport. When 42 of the athletes in the iliopsoas fractional lengthening group were propensity matched to 54 control athletes, the researchers found that both groups demonstrated similar improvements in patient-reported outcomes and rates of return to sport, revision arthroscopy, and achieving psychometric thresholds.

“Competitive athletes undergoing primary hip arthroscopy and intrabursal iliopsoas fractional lengthening in the context of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and painful internal snapping demonstrated favorable patient-reported outcomes and return to sport rate at minimum 5-year follow-up,” the researchers wrote.

Study authors included Andrew E. Jimenez, M.D., Tom George, Michael S. Lee, Jade S. Owens, David R. Maldonado, M.D., Olivia A. Paraschos, Ajay C. Lall, M.D., and Benjamin G. Domb, M.D., all of the American Hip Research Foundation.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy