LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Company News/Regenerative Medicine Pioneer, TissueTech, Rebrands
Company News

Regenerative Medicine Pioneer, TissueTech, Rebrands

April 7, 2022 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

#biotissue#tissuetech#amnioxmedical

One of the most important pioneering biologics firms in the United States (which, really, has not received its due in the world of regenerative medicine), Miami, Florida-based TissueTech, Inc., is now renamed, re-branded and, perhaps even “reborn” as BioTissue, Inc. The newly renamed company will include Amniox Medical, Inc.

“For years, health care professionals have known our products—regardless of their specific applications—for providing mother nature’s most natural gift of healing so their patients can get back to the lives they love,” said Ted Davis, BioTissue president and CEO. “Our new, unified brand supports our entire pipeline of human birth tissue products to aid the treatment of wounds, musculoskeletal conditions, trauma-induced injuries, ocular surface disease, and burns.”

The company’s amniotic membrane products retain their brand names, including Prokera, AmnioGraft, AmnioGuard, Neox, and Clarix. All these products use the company’s proprietary CryoTek cryopreservation technology.

“By combining our efforts behind a single brand and leveraging our collective strengths, the new BioTissue paves the way for more innovative research and development, collaboration with additional healthcare sectors, and a strong pipeline of future products,” said Davis, who recently took leadership of the company upon the retirement of Amy Tseng, BioTissue’s founder and former CEO. “As we look to the future of BioTissue, there are more great things to come.”

BioTissue says that its news includes a bold new design representing “healing, energy, and life.” And according to the company, additional branding is in the works, including a new website, conference/exhibit booth, and customer-facing support materials.

Asked what led to this change, Davis told OTW, “At BioTissue, we are continuously innovating to solve patients’ unmet clinical needs. Pushing the boundaries to set the standard for regenerative medicine has resulted in evolution in not only our products, but in our company.”

“As we pursue FDA approval for new products across surgical and ocular indications, a unified brand supports our entire portfolio of human birth tissue-based products which was born of a life-changing need—to help physicians as healers treat ocular surface diseases, wounds, and chronic pain in their patients with unprecedented efficacy. As we look to the future, it makes sense to operate under one unified brand. The BioTissue brand not only represents our current service and product portfolio, but also our innovation efforts across all applications. BioTissue is intuitive for what our products are all about and what we are doing in the space of regenerative medicine.

When OTW asked how having a single brand might play out over the next year, Davis notes, “For our customers, the transition to BioTissue is intended to be seamless. The products physicians rely on for their patients will not change; they’ll even keep their trusted brand names, including Prokera, Neox, and Clarix. The BioTissue brand allows us to confidently serve the regenerative medicine space with a trusted name that makes sense—now and into the future. We’re excited about what is ahead.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy