LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Sports Medicine/How Long Should a Concussed Athlete be Sidelined?
Sports Medicine

How Long Should a Concussed Athlete be Sidelined?

April 1, 2022 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Secondary#concussion#postinjuryriskfactors#preinjuryriskfactors

What factors predict recovery time for an athlete who has suffered a concussion? A new study has some answers. As the Stanford University authors wrote, “Prognosticating recovery times for individual athletes with a concussion remains a challenge for health care providers. Several preinjury and postinjury factors have been proposed to be predictive of prolonged return-to-play times, but the data in this area are still sparse.”

The study, “Factors Associated With A Prolonged Time to Return to Play After a Concussion,” was published online on March 22, 2022 in The American Journal of Sports Medicine.

To identify risk factors which could delay return to play, the Stanford team collected concussion data for the period between September 2017 and August 2020 at a single National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I institution.

They looked at such preinjury risk factors as age, sex, sport, concussion history and past medical problems as well as postinjury risk factors such as initial and follow-up Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 5th Edition scores, vestibular evaluation findings and eye tracking results.

In total the team collected data for 159 athletes and 187 concussion cases. They found that preinjury factors associated with prolonged return to play times were:

  1. a history of concussions (p = .015),
  2. a history of migraines (p = .013), and
  3. whether an athlete participated in an individual sport (p = .009).

Postinjury modifiers included:

  1. the total number (p = .020) and severity (p = .023) of symptoms as well as,
  2. abnormal Vestibular Ocular Motor Screening findings (p = .002).

Overall, there were 6 different symptoms—balance problems, difficulty concentrating, light sensitivity, drowsiness, fatigue/low energy, and difficulty remembering—that were significantly linked to prolonged return to play times.

“The study also found that the number and severity of symptoms were additive in a dose-dependent fashion. On multivariable analysis of all these factors, a history of concussions was found to be the most predictive of prolonged return to play times, while participation in an individual sport had the largest effect on recovery times,” the researchers wrote.

Advertisement

“Several preinjury and postinjury risk factors were identified as being correlated with prolonged recovery times. Many of these risk factors were also found to be additive in nature. This information provides clinicians with a valuable tool in prognosticating and estimating recovery times for athletes.”

“The study also revealed that athletes participating in individual sports had longer return to play times compared with athletes in team sports, which is a novel finding that requires further research.

The study authors include Eric X. Wang, M.D., Calvin E. Hwang, M.D., Jessica N. Nguyen, B.S., Nicole A. Segovia, MPH, Geoffrey D. Abrams, M.D., and Andrea Kussman, M.D., all of Stanford University School of Medicine.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy