LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/How Effective Is Superior Capsular Reconstruction?
Large Joints and Extremities

How Effective Is Superior Capsular Reconstruction?

February 10, 2022 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Secondary#superiorcapsularreconstruction#massiveirreparablerotatorcufftear

Superior capsular reconstruction is an effective salvage operation for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears, according to a new study.

The researchers found that patients with pseudoparalysis or subscapularis insufficiency experienced significant postoperative improvement in forward elevation and patient-reported outcomes.

The study, “Superior Capsular Reconstruction: A Salvage Option for Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears with Pseudoparalysis or Subscapularis Insufficiency,” evaluated superior capsular reconstruction outcomes after minimum 2-year follow-up and sought to determine which factors affected outcomes.

The findings were published in the February 2022 issue of the journal Arthroscopy.

Forty patients with a mean age of 57.3 years were included in the study. The majority of the patients were male. The minimum follow-up, however, was only reached for 32 patients.

The researchers collected data on patient demographics, preoperative clinical findings, as well as postoperative data which included complications, patient satisfaction, strength and range-of-motion, and patient-reported outcomes.

Overall, the Hamada score was 2 or lower in 88% of the patients with average acromiohumeral interval distance of 6.8 mm. Preoperatively, 6 patients had external rotation lag and 6 had pseudoparalysis.

The researchers determined true insufficiency in 38%. Patients experienced significant improvement in forward elevation 31° increase (p = .007) and strength in all planes (all p < .05).

Advertisement

Patient-reported outcomes also significantly improved. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon score had a 34-point increase; the Visual Analog Scale score 2.9-point decrease; and alpha-numeric evaluation a 48-point increase.

Twenty-six patients were completely or somewhat satisfied with surgery. Nine patients failed superior capsule reconstruction and converted to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. In addition, 4 or 13% of the patients reported complications. In two cases the patients fell.

Patients with pseudoparalysis had significant improvement in post-operative forward elevation (28 vs 154°: p < .0001) and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score (p = .016) with 66% patient satisfaction.

The researchers, however, noted that outcome scores remained lower than superior capsule reconstruction without pseudoparalysis.

In addition, in patients with subscapularis insufficiency, improvements were also seen in postoperative forward elevation and patient-reported outcome scores (p < .005).

“In patients converted from superior capsule reconstruction to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (n = 3), there were no distinguishing characteristics present,” they wrote.

“Superior capsular reconstruction is an effective salvage operation for massive irreparable rotator cuff tear. Patients with pseudoparalysis or subscapularis insufficiency demonstrate significant postoperative improvement in forward elevation and patient-reported outcomes.”

The study authors included Marisa N. Ulrich of Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Travis L. Franz, M.D., of TRIA Orthopaedic Center, Sports Medicine & Shoulder Surgery, Joshua S. Everhart, M.D., M.P.H. of Indiana University School of Medicine, Jonathan D. Barlow, M.D., of the Mayo Clinic, Grant L. Jones, M.D., of TRIA Orthopaedic Center, Sports Medicine & Shoulder Surgery, Julie Y. Bishop, M.D., also of TRIA and Gregory L. Cvetanovich, M.D., of Ohio State Sports Medicine Research Institute.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy