LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/To What Extent Does Scoliosis Tethering Preserve Spinal Motion?
Spine

To What Extent Does Scoliosis Tethering Preserve Spinal Motion?

January 5, 2022 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

#adolescentidiopathicscoliosisSecondary#anteriorvertebralbodytethering#spinalmotion

To what extent is spinal motion preserved when thoracic anterior vertebral body tethering is used instead of spinal fusion to treat adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A new study has answers.

In the study, “Measurable Thoracic Motion Remains at 1 Year Following Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering, with Sagittal Motion Greater Than Coronal Motion,” the researchers evaluated spinal motion in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with anterior vertebral body tethering.

The findings were published in the December 2021 issue of the Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.

“There is limited information regarding the measurable motion that is maintained over the instrumented levels following thoracic anterior vertebral body tethering surgery in humans. The purpose of the present study was to assess radiographic spinal motion 1-year vertebral body tethering,” the researchers wrote.

The 32 patients were a part of a U.S. Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study. At 1 year postoperatively, patients were evaluated using standing flexion-extension and side-bending radiographs in a microdose biplanar slot scanning imaging system.

The angle subtended by the screws at the upper instrumented vertebra and lower instrumented vertebra was measured to evaluate the coronal arc motion. The sagittal Cobb angle was also measured over the instrumented levels on flexion and extension radiographs.

Overall, the mean angle subtended by the screws changed from 15° ± 8° on left-bending radiographs to 8° ± 6° on right-bending radiographs. The mean coronal arc of motion on bending was 7° ± 6°, with 20 (62.5%) of 32 patients having a coronal arc of motion of greater than 5°.

The mean preoperative coronal arc of motion over the instrumented segments was 30° ± 9°. In addition, the mean kyphotic angle over the instrumented segments was 33° ± 13° in flexion and 11° ± 14° in extension, for a mean postoperative arc of motion of 21° ± 12° between flexion and extension radiographs.

Advertisement

“At 1 year following thoracic anterior vertebral body tethering for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, the thoracic spine showed a measurable range of coronal and sagittal plane motion over the instrumented levels without evidence of complete autofusion. Motion in the coronal plane decreased by 77% following anterior vertebral body tethering. These findings provide proof of concept that sagittal spinal motion is preserved after thoracic anterior vertebral body tethering, although the functional importance remains to be determined,” the study authors wrote.

Study authors included Abdul Fettah Buyuk, M.D., Todd A. Milbrandt, M.D., Smitha E. Mathew, M.B.B.S. and A. Noelle Larson, M.D., all of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy