LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Sports Medicine/Runners’ Injury Risk Factors Might Surprise You
Sports Medicine

Runners’ Injury Risk Factors Might Surprise You

January 27, 2022 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Secondary#injuryriskfactors#recreationalrunners

A new study sheds some light on the injury risk factors for recreational runners. One of the most surprising findings was that vertical impact peak, loading rate, and step rate were not risk factors at all.

In the study, “Spatiotemporal and Ground-Reaction-Force Characteristics as Risk Factors for Running-Related Injury: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial Including 800+ Recreational Runners,” published online on January 20, 2022 in The American Journal of Sports Medicine, the researchers sought to identify risk factors among spatiotemporal and ground-reaction force characteristics in recreational runner.

They also wanted to know if shoe cushioning changed the way running biomechanics impacted injury risk.

“Running biomechanics may play a role in running-related injury development, but to date, only a few modifiable factors have been prospectively associated with injury risk,” the researchers wrote.

For the study, they tested 848 recreational runners on an instrumented treadmill at their preferred running speed. They were all randomly assigned to wear either hard or soft cushioned shoes.

The researchers calculated typical kinetic and spatiotemporal metrics from ground-reaction force recordings. All the runners were then tracked for up to six months for running activity and injury risk.

They found that greater injury risk was associated with greater step length (sub hazard rate ratio [SHR], 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02; p = .038), longer flight time (SHR, 1.00; 95% CI, 1.00-1.01; p = .028), shorter contact time (SHR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.99-1.00; p = .030), and lower duty factor (defined as the ratio between contact time and stride time; SHR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.91-0.98; p = .005).

And when they stratified the analysis by shoe version and adjusted for previous injury and running speed, they determined that lower duty factor was associated with a greater injury risk for runners using soft shoes, but not for those wearing hard shoes.

Advertisement

“Lower duty factor is an injury risk factor, especially for softer shoe use. Contrary to widespread beliefs, vertical impact peak, loading rate, and step rate were not injury risk factors in recreational runners,” the researchers wrote.

The study authors included Laurent Malisoux and Paul Gette of Luxembourg Institute of Health in Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg, Nicolas Delattre of Villeneuve d’Ascq in France, Axel Urbausen, M.D., of Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg in Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg, and Daniel Theisen of ALAN-Maladies Rares Luxembourg in the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy