LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Patients Who Feel Involved Have Better Outcomes?
Large Joints and Extremities

Patients Who Feel Involved Have Better Outcomes?

January 25, 2022 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

#totaljointarthroplastySecondary#patientinvolvement

Joint research between the Dartmouth Medical School in Hanover, New Hampshire and the HealthPartners Institute in Minneapolis, Minnesota suggests don’t underestimate the power of patient involvement.

This team has just published a study titled, “Is Shared Decision-making Associated with Better Patient-reported Outcomes? A Longitudinal Study of Patients Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty,” which appears in the January 2022 edition of Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.

“Despite great interest in improving patient-centered care by increased shared decision-making [SDM], and despite good evidence for its beneficial effects on patient knowledge, confidence, and satisfaction with care, there is so far no evidence as to whether it also improves clinical outcomes,” Senior Investigator Leif Solberg, M.D. of HealthPartners Institute stated to OTW. “Thus, there is relatively little use of systematic use of shared decision-making in practice, despite CMS [Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services] increasingly requiring its use for reimbursement. Such evidence is badly needed to spur greater use.”

The authors designed an observational study where they collected survey data prior to surgery for patients receiving a primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and then again 12 months postoperatively. The team used the collaboRATE measure of shared decision making, as well as existing patient surveys of patient reported outcome measure, noting that at the time, neither the surgeons nor the department had an organized approach to shared decision making. The Oxford knee or hip score, the patient rating of the provider, and whether a patient would recommend the provider were also assessed.

In the final analysis, 48% (1,334 procedures) of the patients responded to both the preoperative and 12-month postoperative surveys (859 TKAs and 485 THAs). The vast majority of patients included in the analytic sample were white (93%); 3% used Medicaid benefits at the time of surgery.

Dr. Solberg summarized the results of the study to OTW, “We demonstrated in 1,334 hip or knee replacement patients that increased shared decision-making pre-operatively was associated with higher joint function and patient ratings of their surgeons at 12 months after surgery. In other words, if patients felt more involved in the decision to have surgery, their outcomes were actually better.”

“Wider knowledge of these findings should stimulate greater efforts by clinicians and care systems to engage their patients in the important decisions about care. Hopefully, it will also stimulate more studies of this relationship, especially studies that randomize patients to varying amounts and types of shared decision-making so we can learn whether this association is causative.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy