LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Sports Medicine/Massive New Arthroplasty Research Opportunity Available
Sports Medicine

Massive New Arthroplasty Research Opportunity Available

January 20, 2022 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

#arthroplastySecondary#returntogolf

Despite the fact that more than 25 million people play golf in the United States—which is 1 person out of 8. And even though golfing inflicts unique stresses on joints, there is a shocking lack of prospective data on demographic, surgical and golf-specific outcomes after arthroplasty, according to a new study.

For an up-and-coming researcher in orthopedics, this is an opportunity.

Based on what data IS available, researchers have found evidence that golfers return to the sport at a fairly high rate following hip arthroplasty surgery.

The study, “Rate and Timing of Return to Golf After Hip, Knee, or Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis,” was published online on January 12, 2022 in The American Journal of Sports Medicine.

“The physical and mental health benefits of golf are well recognized, and as a moderate-intensity activity, it is an ideal sport for patients after joint arthroplasty,” the researchers wrote.

In their study, they sought to assess the rate and timing of returning to golf and the factors associated with these after hip, knee, or shoulder arthroplasty.

They identified articles to analyze using PubMed and Medline. The criterion for inclusion was any published research article studying return to golf after arthroplasty. A total of 23 studies were included in the analysis. The mean age of patients was 66.8 years (SD, 3.37).

Four of the studies reported on hip arthroplasty, 6 on knee arthroplasty and 13 on shoulder arthroplasty.

Advertisement

Among 13 studies, the mean rate of returning to golf was 80% (95% CI, 70%-89.9%. hip, knee, and shoulder arthroplasty had mean return rates of 90% (95% CI, 82%-98%), 70% (95% CI, 39%-100%) and 80% (95% CI, 68%-92%), respectively.

Among 9 studies, the mean time to return to golf was 4.4 months (95% CI, 3.2-6). In addition, there was no change in handicap reported in 8 studies (35%) with a mean change of −0.1 (95% CI, –2.4 to +2.2).

None of the studies presented factors associated with return to golf, the researchers said.

“This is the first meta-analysis of returning to golf after joint arthroplasty. The study reports a high rate of returning to golf, which was greatest after hip arthroplasty. However, the study highlights the paucity of prospective data on demographic, surgical, and golf-specific outcomes after arthroplasty. Future prospective studies are required to eliminate response bias and accurately capture golf and patient-specific outcomes.

The study authors include Patrick G. Robinson, MBChB, MSc(Res) of the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Tom R. Williamson, MBChB of the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Andrew P. Creighton, D.O. of the Hospital for Special Surgery, Jennifer Cheng, Ph.D. of the Hospital for Surgery, Andrew D. Murray, MBChB of the University of Edinburgh, Heidi Prather, D.O. of the Hospital for Special Surgery, Joshua S. Dines, M.D., of the Hospital for Special Surgery, Lawrence V. Gulotta, M.D. of Hospital for Special Surgery, Edwin P. Su, M.D., of Hospital for Special Surgery, Joel M. Press, M.D., of Hospital for Special Surgery, Roger Hawkes, MBChB of University of College London, and Nick D. Clement, MBChB, Ph.D. of the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy