LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Latarjet Shoulder Stabilization and Epileptic Patients: NEW Study
Large Joints and Extremities

Latarjet Shoulder Stabilization and Epileptic Patients: NEW Study

January 31, 2022 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

#shoulderinstabilitySecondary#laterjetprocedure#epilepsy

A new study comparing outcomes of 19 epileptic patients to outcomes of 21 non-epileptic patients provides evidence that Latarjet is effective when used for shoulder stabilization.

In the study, “Outcomes of Arthroscopic Latarjet Procedure for Anterior Glenohumeral Instability in Patients With Epilepsy: A Case-Control Study,” published online on January 12, 2022 in The American Journal of Sports Medicine, the researchers evaluated Latarjet procedure outcomes of patients with epilepsy versus patients without the condition.

“Unacceptably high rates of re-dislocation, reoperation, osteoarthritis, and coracoid nonunion have been reported in patients with a seizure disorder after surgery for shoulder instability,” the researchers wrote.

For the retrospective and comparative case-control analysis of patients, 19 patients with epilepsy were matched with 21 patients without a history of the seizure disorder. The researchers collected data on demographics, surgical indications, and imaging data. The analysis included up to 2 years of clinical outcomes after the procedure.

Outcomes included Rowe score, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, Constant-Murley Shoulder Outcome score and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation.

The researchers also determined incidences of complications, recurrent instability, re-dislocation, revision surgery, repeated seizures, and the presence of osteoarthritis, coracoid nonunion and osteolysis.

Over a follow-up of almost 5 years, the researchers found no significant differences in functional outcomes between patients with and without epilepsy on Rowe (p = .917), Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (p = .621), Constant-Murley Shoulder Outcome score (p = .600), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (p = .859) scores.

Overall, 5 patients continued to have seizures postoperative, but no seizure-related glenohumeral instability. The researchers noted that 1 dislocation and 1 subluxation occurred during sports activities in each group. The recurrence rate was 9.5%.

Advertisement

Bone defects did not influence outcomes, they also reported. They observed osteoarthritic changes of the glenohumeral joint in 5 shoulders in the epilepsy group and in 3 among the matched controls.

They also did not observe any cases of coracoid nonunion or osteolysis.

In addition, while there was no significant difference in postoperative athletic activity between the two groups, patients with epilepsy did have lower pre- and postoperative sports participation.

“Arthroscopic Latarjet stabilization can lead to improved functional and subjective outcomes and should be considered in patients with epilepsy with recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. These results can be achieved regardless of the presence of bone defect and the postoperative control of seizure and are similar to those in patients without epilepsy,” the researchers wrote.

Study authors included Lika Dzidzishvilli, M.D., of Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz in Madrid, Spain, Claudio Calvo, M.D., of Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile in Santiago De Chile, Chile and Maria Valencia, M.D., and Emilio Calvo, M.D. of Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy