LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/How Much Does ‘Frailty’ Contribute to Adverse Surgical Outcomes?
Large Joints and Extremities

How Much Does ‘Frailty’ Contribute to Adverse Surgical Outcomes?

January 4, 2022 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Secondary#aging#frailty#surgicalrisk

A new systematic review from Stanford University has found that despite substantial variability in frailty measurements, frailty is indeed “highly associated” with postoperative outcomes in orthopedic surgery. The study, “Is Frailty Associated with Adverse Outcomes After Orthopaedic Surgery?” appears in the December 2021 edition of JBJS Reviews.

“With the aging population,” said co-author Robin N. Kamal, M.D., M.B.A., medical director of Value Based Care and Orthopaedics in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at Stanford University, “an increasing number of orthopaedic procedures are being done on older adults and frailty is a known risk factor for adverse outcomes after surgery. Some studies suggest the prevalence of frailty is as high as 40% in some populations, suggesting it is becoming a global epidemic. Care delivery will therefore increasingly require diagnosing and treating frailty, including orthopaedic surgery clinics, to optimize patient outcomes.”

The researchers used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, searching PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify articles reporting on outcomes after orthopaedic surgery within frail populations; 82 articles were ultimately included.

The modified frailty index was the most frequently used frailty instrument (38% of the studies used the modified frailty index with 11 items, and 24% of the studies used the modified frailty index with 5 items); a total of 24 different instruments were identified. Total joint arthroplasty (22%), hip fracture management (17%), and adult spinal deformity management (15%) were the most studied procedures; complications (71%) and mortality (51%) were the most often reported outcomes; 17% of studies reported on a functional outcome.

“The most common method of diagnosing frailty in orthopaedic surgery was using the modified frailty index, which is a comorbidity-based measure, but there was considerable heterogeneity in frailty instruments used,” Dr. Kamal told OTW. “Frailty was highly associated with adverse post-operative outcomes after orthopaedic surgery. Future research in this field should focus on the influence of frailty in orthopaedic surgery using prospective study designs, long-term outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes.”

When OTW asked how this work might alter practice, Dr. Kamal stated, “Preoperatively identifying high-risk orthopaedic surgery patients through frailty instruments has the potential to improve patient outcomes and direct appropriate site of service of patients. Frailty screenings can also create opportunities for targeted intervention efforts and guide shared decision-making to align treatments with patient-specific risks of surgery.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy