LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/BMI Not Sufficient to Deny Total Joint Surgery: New Study
Large Joints and Extremities

BMI Not Sufficient to Deny Total Joint Surgery: New Study

January 25, 2022 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

#totalkneearthroplasty#obesity#bodymassindex

If Mr. Smith is a few pounds too heavy for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), are we denying surgery to someone who may in fact have a comparatively complication-free experience?

This is the zeitgeist of new work from the University of Iowa titled, “What is the Impact of Body Mass Index Cutoffs on Total Knee Arthroplasty Complications?” The study appears in the December 21, 2021 edition of The Journal of Arthroplasty.

“The national obesity epidemic and increasing demand for total knee arthroplasty led to interest in this topic,” co-author David DeMik, M.D., Pharm.D. told OTW. “In addition to being a growing national problem, many patients who are deemed too ‘high risk’ for joint replacement are prescribed weight loss.”

“Unfortunately, many are unable to achieve this, then undergo a surgery at a higher body mass index (BMI) and with potentially worse arthritis. A similar study from Stanford by Dr. Nicholas Giori found similar results in veteran patients and our goal was to see if the findings were similar in a more generalizable patient sample.”

The researchers looked at individuals who had elective, primary TKA from 2015 to 2018 (from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database; Common Procedural Terminology code 27447). They used BMI cutoffs of 30, 35, 40, 45, and 50 kg/m2 to model the incidence of complications if TKA would have been permitted or denied based on the BMI.

“A total of 314,719 patients underwent TKA, and 46,386 (14.7%) had a BMI ≥40 kg/m2,” wrote the authors. “With a BMI cutoff of 40 kg/m2, 268,333 (85.3%) patients would have undergone TKA. A total of 282,552 (94.8%) would experience complication-free surgery, and 17.3% of all complications would be prevented.”

“TKA would proceed for 309,479 (98.3%) patients at a BMI cutoff of 50 kg/m2. A total of 293,108 (94.7%) would not experience a complication, and 2.8% of complications would be prevented. A BMI cutoff of 35 kg/m2 would prevent 36.6% of all complications while allowing 94.8% of complication-free surgeries to proceed.”

“The majority of obese patients can undergo elective total knee arthroplasty without experiencing an early complication,” commented Dr. DeMik to OTW. “Any BMI cutoff for knee replacement will deny some patients a procedure that would have occurred without any complication. Raising the BMI cutoff allowed more patients to undergo complication-free surgery while preventing a relatively smaller number of complications. Conversely, lower BMI cutoffs did seem to considerably restrict access to surgery.”

“This study provides additional information about how to navigate risks of total knee arthroplasty in the obese and morbidly obese. While many patients with BMI exceeding the traditional cutoff of 40 kg/m2 can undergo surgery without an early complication, it is important to remember complications still do occur and the follow-up period for this study is relatively short (30-days). The decision to undergo joint replacement is best done with shared decision making between patients and surgeons, taking into account all patient factors rather than just a BMI number.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy