LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Increased Glenohumeral Joint Load Can Be Reversed
Large Joints and Extremities

Increased Glenohumeral Joint Load Can Be Reversed

December 1, 2021 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

#rotatorcuffrepairSecondary#increasedglenohumeraljointload

Rotator cuff repair can be used to reverse increased glenohumeral joint load, according to a new study.

In “Increased Glenohumeral Joint Loads Due to a Supraspinatus Tear Can Be Reversed with Rotator Cuff Repair,” published online on November 18, 2021 in the journal Arthroscopy, the researchers evaluated the effect of an isolated full-thickness supraspinatus tear on glenohumeral kinematics and contact mechanics. They also wanted to assess improvement following rotator cuff repair.

To do this, they tested ten fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders with a dynamic shoulder simulator. The pressure mapping sensor was placed between the humeral head and glenoid. Three different conditions were analyzed: native, isolated full-thickness supraspinatus tear, and rotator cuff repair.

They measured maximum abduction angle and superior humeral head migration using 3D motion tracking software. They also assessed cumulative deltoid force and glenohumeral contact mechanics, including contact area and contact pressure at resting position and 15°, 30°, 45°, and 60° of glenohumeral abduction.

Overall, the supraspinatus tear resulted in a significant decrease in maximum abduction angle (Δ-8.3°; p < .001) along with a superior humeral migration of 6.4 ± 3.8mm, while significantly increasing cumulative deltoid force (Δ20.5N; p = .008), glenohumeral contact mechanics (Δ63.1kPa; p < .001), and peak glenohumeral contact pressure (Δ278.6kPa; p < .001) as well as decreasing glenohumeral contact area (Δ-45.8mm 2 ; p < .001) at each degree of abduction.

Rotator cuff repair reduced superior humeral head migration to 1.2 ± 2.5mm, while restoring native maximum abduction angle, cumulative deltoid force (Δ1.8N), glenohumeral contact area (Δ4.5mm2), glenohumeral contact pressure (Δ-4.5kPa) and peak glenohumeral contact pressure (Δ19.9kPa) at each degree of abduction (p > .999, respectively).

“In a dynamic biomechanical cadaveric model, increased glenohumeral joint loads due to a full-thickness supraspinatus tear can be reversed with rotator cuff repair. More specifically, rotator cuff repair restored native glenohumeral contact area and contact pressure, while preventing superior humeral head migration and decreasing compensatory deltoid forces,” the researchers wrote.

“These time-zero observations indicate that undergoing rotator cuff repair may prevent the development of degenerative changes by significantly reducing glenohumeral joint loads and ensuring sufficiently stable joint kinematics.”

The study authors included Lukas N. Muench, M.D. of Technical University of Munich, Germany, Daniel P. Berthold, M.D. of Technical University of Munich, Germany, Alexander Otto of Technical University of Munich, Germany, M.D., Felix Dyrna, M.D. of University of Münster, Germany, Ryan Bell of University of Connecticut, Elifho Obopilwe of University of Connecticut, Mark P. Cote of University of Connecticut, Andreas B. Imhoff, M.D. of Technical University of Munich, Augustus D. Mazzocca, M.D. of University of Connecticut, and Knut Beitzel, M.D. of Technical University of Munich.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy