LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Sports Medicine/How Predictable Is Return to Sport After Meniscal Allograft?
Sports Medicine

How Predictable Is Return to Sport After Meniscal Allograft?

December 1, 2021 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Secondary#returntosport#meniscalautografttransplantation

Return to sport after meniscal allograft transplantation is questionable, according to a new study. While case studies claim a higher return to sports rate after meniscal allograft use, this research team questioned that and called for additional data in order to put a reliable p-value on whatever the outcomes are.

In the study, “Return to Sports Following Meniscal Allograft Transplantation is Possible but Remains Questionable: A Systematic Review,” published online on November 13, 2021 in the journal Arthroscopy, the research team did a systematic review of the literature in order to tease out whatever return to sport data might exist.

The team searched PubMed, Web of Science and Embase, all roughly a year ago, December 2020. They looked specifically for clinical studies which provided return to sport rate data following meniscal allograft transplantation with at least 12-month follow-up.

They found 14 case series with data covering an aggregate of 670 patients. Five of the studies, they found, used the bone bridge technique. Another five studies provided data regarding suture fixations with bone tunnels were used for all transplantation. In two case studies, the focus was on bone plugs for medial menisci and bone bridge for lateral menisci. One additional study covered suture fixation for medial menisci and bone bridge for lateral menisci.

Overall, the research team found, return to sports rates ranged between 20% and 92%. Two studies, specifically, reported a low return to sport rate.

How long did it take for these allograft transplanted athletes to return to sport? It ranged from 7.6 and 16.9 months. Furthermore, the percentage of athletes who were able to return to pre-injury levels ranged from 7% to 100%, depending on the study and the procedure (naturally).

Interestingly, 2 of the 14 studies reported that meniscal allograft athletes were able to exceed their prior level of sports activity.

The studies reviewed did not commonly report on return to a lower level of sports activity. In aggregate, the Lysholm knee scores, the subjective international knee documentation committee scores and the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score all showed significant improvements after the transplantation.

Advertisement

In one study the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score did not change significantly.

Reoperation rates ranged all over the place, from 3.1% to 80%. Similarly, procedure failure rates ranged from 1.1% and 30.1%.

“Despite that most studies reported high return to sports rate, the current level of evidence is low with all studies being case series. There is significant variability in the reported return to sports rate, time, and level. Therefore, high-quality comparative studies are mandated to elucidate whether meniscal allograft transplantation is associated with higher return to sports rates and levels,” the authors wrote.

Bottom line: This is a fertile area for more and better clinical study.

The study authors included Abdulaziz F. Ahmed, M.D. of Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Joseph Rinaldi of Florida International University, Ali S. Noorzad, M.D. of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, and Bashir A. Zikria, M.D. of Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy