LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Sports Medicine/Pitch Velocity Best Predictor of Elbow Valgus Torque
Sports Medicine

Pitch Velocity Best Predictor of Elbow Valgus Torque

November 30, 2021 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Secondary#elbowvalgustorque#pitchingarmkinetics#shoulderdistractionforce

Pitch velocity is the predictive factor that most influences elbow valgus toque and shoulder distraction force in pitching arm kinetics, according to a new study.

The authors of “Machine Learning and Statistical Prediction of Pitching Arm Kinetics,” wrote, “Over the past decade, research has attempted to elucidate the cause of throwing-related injuries in the baseball athlete. However, when considering the entire kinetic chain, full body mechanics, and pitching cycle sequencing, there are hundreds of variables that could influence throwing arm health, and there is a lack of quality investigations evaluating the relationship and influence of multiple variables on arm stress.”

For the study that was published online November 15, 2021, in The American Journal of Sports Medicine, researchers wanted to identify the variables that have the most influence on elbow valgus torque and shoulder distraction force using a machine learning approach.

The retrospective review included baseball pitchers who underwent biomechanical evaluation at an university biomechanics laboratory. The researchers created regression models and 4 machine learning models for both elbow valgus torque and shoulder distraction force. They all used the same predictor variable including pitch velocity and 17 pitching mechanics.

Included in the analysis were 168 high school and college pitchers with a mean age of 16.7 years (SD, 3.2 years) and BMI [body mass index] of 24.4 (SD, 1.2).

For both elbow valgus torque and shoulder distraction force, the gradient boosting machine models demonstrated the most precise calibrations compared to the other models.

The one for elbow valgus torque showed that pitch velocity had the highest influence with five mechanical variables also having significant influence. The model for shoulder distraction force also showed that pitch velocity had the highest influence. Six mechanical variables also had significant influence in this model.

While pitch velocity was the most influential model in both models, the authors wrote that pitching mechanics including maximum humeral rotation velocity, shoulder abduction at foot strike and maximum humeral rotation were also of significant influence.

Advertisement

“The results of this study can be used to inform players, coaches, and clinicians on specific mechanical variables that may be optimized to mitigate elbow or shoulder stress that could lead to throwing-related injury,” they wrote.

The authors of the study included Kristen F. Nicholson, Ph.D., Brian R. Waterman, M.D. and Garrett S. Bullock, P.T., D.P.T. of Wake Forest School of Medicine in Winston-Salem, North Carolina and Gary S. Collins, Ph.D. of Oxford University in Oxford, United Kingdom.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy