LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/New Tip for Reducing Wrong Site Spine Surgery Risk
Spine

New Tip for Reducing Wrong Site Spine Surgery Risk

November 25, 2021 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Secondary#LumbosacralAnatomy#VertebralNumbering

Surgeons need total clarity when it comes to identifying the correct vertebral segment. But for patients with a thoracolumbar transitional vertebra and/or a lumbosacral transitional vertebra, wrong site spine surgery is a definite possibility.

A new study from the Spine Center, Yokohama Minami Kyosai Hospital in Kanagawa, Japan, addresses this issue. The study, “Changes in Lumbosacral Anatomy and Vertebral Numbering in Patients with Thoracolumbar and/or Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae,” appears in the July-September 2021 edition of JBJS Open Access.

The authors noted that the traditional Castellvi lumbosacral transitional vertebra classification addresses coronal, but not sagittal or axial images. Co-author Yasunori Tatara, M.D., Ph.D. is with the Spine Center at Yokohama Minami Kyosai Hospital in Kanagawa, Japan, and explained to OTW, “When I was writing my paper on the S2-alar-iliac screw, I realized the importance of the presence of the transitional vertebra in the lumbosacral region.”

“Therefore, I decided to write a new paper focusing on transitional vertebrae. In this study, we investigated the incidence of the thoracolumbar transitional vertebra and lumbosacral transitional vertebra and examined their anatomical features on CT images.”

The research team examined medical records for 880 patients who had received spinopelvic fixation between July 2014 and March 2020. The authors then searched for patients with thoracolumbar transitional vertebrae and lumbosacral transitional vertebrae.

They found lumbosacral transitional vertebrae in 111 patients, with the most common type being Castellvi type-III. Thoracolumbar transitional vertebrae were associated with lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (87 out of 111). The team found that on sagittal images, the lumbosacral transitional anatomy of Castellvi lumbosacral transitional vertebrae resembled that of normal L5-S1, and the lumbosacral transitional anatomy of S6 lumbosacral transitional vertebrae resembled that of normal S1-S2.

“The most frequent lumbosacral transitional vertebra type was Castellvi type-III lumbosacral transitional vertebrae,” said Dr. Tatara to OTW. “Thoracolumbar transitional vertebrae coexisted with lumbosacral transitional vertebrae at a high incidence, and the converse was also true.”

“Although a lumbosacral transitional vertebra has both L5 and S1 elements,” he further explained, “Castellvi lumbosacral transitional vertebrae have a higher proportion of L5 elements than S1 elements. The S1 upper segment of Castellvi lumbosacral transitional vertebrae appeared as S2 on axial CT images; therefore, particularly for Castellvi type-IIIb lumbosacral transitional vertebrae, considering S1 as S2 is clinically less problematic.”

Advertisement

“Although a thoracolumbar transitional vertebra has both T12 and L1 elements, a thoracolumbar transitional vertebra is likely to be considered L1 on radiographs because of its association with the rudimentary rib. However, given the high incidence of thoracolumbar transitional vertebrae coexisting with lumbosacral transitional vertebrae, monitoring thoracolumbar transitional vertebrae would aid in reducing vertebral numbering errors.”

“The 3-dimensional CT images are suitable for detecting transitional vertebrae, and our findings may contribute to reducing the incidences of wrong-site surgery and diagnostic errors in patients with these conditions.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy