LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/Kleiner Labs Interbody Device Cleared by FDA
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

Kleiner Labs Interbody Device Cleared by FDA

October 7, 2021 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

#fda510kclearanceSecondary#kleinerdevicelabs#interbodysystem

The FDA has 510(k) cleared Kleiner Device Labs’ KG2 Surge flow-thru interbody system.

Addressing “Vexing” Challenge

In a September 22, 2021, press release, company founder and CEO Jeff Kleiner, M.D., said getting adequate graft and fill volume and distribution of graft within the intervertebral disc space, “is one of the most vexing challenges in spinal fusion procedures.”

The company said the system “maximizes total bone graft delivery volume, better distributes graft bilaterally into the intervertebral disc space, and streamlines the implant delivery, positioning and grafting process for TLIF and PLIF spinal fusion procedures.”

According to the FDA clearance documents, the KG2 is a cage intended for “lumbar intervertebral fusion (PLIF/TLIF approach). The design contains both solid and porous structures formed as a diamond mesh, and it contains a bone grafting hole.”

The device is 3-D printed titanium and features a diamond lattice porous structure to facilitate bone ingrowth and may be used with cover plate.

The sterile implant comes pre-assembled on the inserter and includes pre-packaged sterile, single-use instrumentation for primary insertion, graft passing, and cover plate insertion. A reusable set of instruments is included for disc preparation, trial sizing, and repositioning/removal.

“The surgeon opens our tray with a ready-to-use system in their hands. The learning curve is low for operating room staff, and the KG2 Surge system works in both MIS [minimally invasive spine] and open approaches. The associated reusable instrument package allows for immediate revision at every step, should the surgeon desire implant repositioning or removal,” stated the company press release.

Advertisement

The devices will initially be available in footprints of 9x24mm, 11x28mm and 11x32mm, with heights of 7 to 14mm, and lordosis of 0 and 6 degrees.

Indications

According to the FDA documents, the implant is indicated for “transforaminal and posterior interbody fusion of the spine in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) and up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis of the lumbar spine at one level or two contiguous levels.

“The KG2 implant is used to facilitate interbody fusion in the lumbar spine from L2 to S1 using autogenous and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft to facilitate fusion. The interbody fusion devices are intended to be used with FDA-cleared supplemental fixation designed for the implanted level.”

It took the FDA about four months to clear the device after determining the KG2 is substantially equivalent to predicates from Osseus Fusion Systems, Stryker Corporation (K2M) and NuVasive, Inc.

Here’s a short video of how the system works.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy