LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Orthopedic Specialty Hospitals Better Than General Hospitals?
Large Joints and Extremities

Orthopedic Specialty Hospitals Better Than General Hospitals?

September 7, 2021 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Secondary#orthopedicspecialtyhospitals

Mrs. X goes to an orthopedic specialty hospital while Mrs. Y goes to a general hospital—both are treated with total knee arthroplasties. How do their results compare? A group of researchers recently decided to look at patient characteristics and outcomes at both U.S. orthopedic specialty hospitals and general hospitals. Their study, “Orthopaedic Specialty Hospitals Compared with General Hospitals: A Systematic Review of Demographic, Clinical, and Financial Parameters,” was published in the August 2021 edition of JBJS Reviews.

According to co-author Fotios Tjoumakaris, M.D., professor of orthopedic surgery and associate director of Sports Medicine Research at the Sidney Kimmel College of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia, the purpose of the study was to “Determine whether patient outcomes and satisfaction were superior at hospitals that rendered specialty orthopaedic care relative to general hospitals. In our geographic region, we were seeing a shift in patients preferring specialty hospital care for their orthopaedic needs and wanted to determine if this paradigm shift was evidence-based in treatment outcomes.”

The researchers queried PubMed and Embase from inception to April 2020 and pulled up 3,715 articles that addressed some aspect of the specialty hospital vs. general hospital paradigm. In total, the research team included 19 retrospective studies performed from 2005 to 2019 in their final analysis. The research team collected data regarding patient demographic characteristics, procedure volume, operative time and length of stay, adverse events, patient satisfaction, and hospital finances.

“There were conflicting results with regards to preferential patient selection and profitability,” wrote the authors. OSHs [orthopedic specialty hospitals] generate a greater surgical volume, while decreasing operative time and length of stay, compared with general hospitals. Adverse outcomes have been reported to be less common at orthopedic specialty hospitals; however, this benefit is not supported by recent matched-cohort studies. Only one study evaluated patient satisfaction, and this study demonstrated improved satisfaction with orthopedic specialty hospitals.”

Positive results…but why?

“I think our most important finding was that patients, overall, did prefer specialty orthopaedic hospitals as they garnered higher patient satisfaction scores,” said Dr. Tjoumakaris to OTW. “While outcomes also trended better at specialty hospitals, this may have been due to preferential patient selection.”

“The major implication of our work is that the care we deliver to patients should be based in evidence. While it’s clear that patients may prefer specialty care hospitals, a critical analysis of cost, treatment outcomes, and adverse events should continue to occur to make sure that the value-add to our system is in the best interest of the patient. Healthcare dollars are a limited resource, and we should continue to conserve this resource while providing the best product and outcome for the patient. Our team wanted to make sure that this paradigm shift in care wasn’t coming at the expense of patient care—and at least, for now, it generally isn’t.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy