LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Unplanned Movement Increases Risk of Knee Injury
Large Joints and Extremities

Unplanned Movement Increases Risk of Knee Injury

August 23, 2021 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Secondary#kneeinjury#unplannedmovement

Why are amateur athletes more prone to injury than professional athletes? One cause is, literally, unplanned movements versus planned movements while playing sports. Training and muscle memory, which professional athletes work at for years, create an economy and focus of movement which not only results in higher skill levels but also lower injury rates.

A new study looked at the role of unplanned movements as a contributing cause of sports injury and found that they result in higher knee abduction and tibial internal rotation moments and therefore increased risk for knee injury.

In the study, “Effect of unplanned athletic movement on knee mechanics: a systematic review with multilevel meta-analysis,” published online on August 3, 2021 in the British Journal of Sports Medicine, they compared the effects of pre-planned and unplanned movement tasks on knee biomechanics in uninjured individuals.

The systematic review with meta-analysis drew data from five databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect and Web of Science which were all searched from inception to November 2020. All cross-sectional, (randomized controlled/non-controlled trials comparing knee angles/moments of pre-planned and unplanned single-leg landings/cuttings were included.

The researchers used a multilevel meta-analysis with a robust random-effects meta-regression model to pool the standardized mean differences of knee mechanics between pre-planned and unplanned tasks. They also examined the influence of possible effect modifiers in a moderator analysis.

Quality of evidence was assessed using the tool of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation working group.

Overall, 25 trials with 485 participants were included. Quality of evidence was downgraded due to potential risk of bias such as confounding factors.

The research team found a pattern in the data which indicated that unplanned tasks resulted in significantly higher external knee abduction (SMD [standardized mean differences]: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.16 to 0.51, 14 studies) and tibial internal rotation moments (SMD: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.79, 11 studies). Furthermore, the team did not detect any significant between-condition differences for sagittal plane mechanics (p > 0.05).

Advertisement

The moderator analysis showed that increased abduction moments especially occurred in non-professional athletes (SMD: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.95, 5 studies).

“Unplanned movement entails higher knee abduction and tibial internet rotation moments, which could predispose for knee injury. Exercise professionals designing injury-prevention protocols, especially for non-elite athletes, should consider the implementation of assessments and exercises requiring time-constrained decision-making.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy