LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/FDA Clears Cost Saving Wrist Plating System
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

FDA Clears Cost Saving Wrist Plating System

August 19, 2021 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

#fda510kclearanceSecondary#wristsurgery#orthopardicimplantcompany

The Orthopaedic Implant Company of Reno, Nevada, says its newly FDA 510(k) cleared wrist plating technology “significantly” reduced costs for ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) and hospitals treating distal radius fractures.

“How exactly?” we asked the company.

53% Reduced Costs

Company CEO Itai Nemovicher told us, “For more than ten years, we’ve consistently delivered on the promise of cost savings in combination with exceptional clinical outcomes with all of our technology—everything from our cannulated screws to our external fixation system to our locking plates. This includes clinical literature on our original distal radius plate, which reduced costs by 53% in comparison to conventional offerings. Despite the many upgrades we’ve made with the DRPx, the pricing is exactly the same as the original implant. It’s the right thing to do.”

DRPx Locking Distal Radius Plate System

The DRPx Locking Distal Radius Plate System, according to an August 4, 2021 company announcement, features “an enhanced” ergonomic design and, according to FDA documents, is indicated for the fixation of intra- and extra-articular fractures and osteotomies of the distal radius.

The system consists of titanium plates for the distal radius, bone pegs, bone screws and instruments to facilitate implantation. The plates come in a variety of sizes and are pre-contoured to match the anatomy of the distal radius. They accept 2.0mm locking pegs, 2.3mm locking screws, and 2.6mm and 3.5mm locking and non-locking bone screws. The bone screws range in length from 6mm to 30mm.

The system, designed with Type II anodized titanium, also includes instruments used to implant the plates and features:

Advertisement

  • Pre-contoured anatomic plates
  • Low-profile plate and screw design to minimize soft tissue impingement
  • Variable angle and fixed angle locking screws, locking pegs, and non-locking screws provide optionality for any technique
  • Distal window for graft and/or fracture visualization
  • Indicator lines for improved guidance and adjustment
  • A full spectrum of targeting instrumentation that facilitates precise and fast drilling trajectories

Nikola Babovic, M.D., of the Reno Orthopedic Center, noted that wrist fractures are one of the most common injuries treated by orthopedic surgeons. “For those patients who benefit from surgical treatment, it is important to do so quickly, safely, and predictably. With the many barriers surgeons face in providing this type of care in today’s health care system, there has been a shift towards the outpatient surgical setting. Lowering the cost of internal fixation devices eliminates cost as the rate limiting step for successfully moving orthopedic trauma into the surgery center setting.”

“The creation of a truly high value distal radius plate such as the DRPx is long overdue, as it will help surgery centers reduce the cost of care without sacrificing quality. These savings can be passed directly to patients, especially those who are underinsured or paying out of pocket for medical care,” concluded Babovic.

Nemovicher added that a new standard needs to be set clinically and financially in orthopedics, “and that’s what we’re doing. DRPx can compete with the most feature-rich distal radius plates on the market. It is engineered to support exceptional clinical outcomes and reduce costs while providing surgeons with much-needed familiarity and flexibility when it comes to technique.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy