LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/TJA Work Load Increased, But CMS Cut wRVUs 5%!?
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

TJA Work Load Increased, But CMS Cut wRVUs 5%!?

July 8, 2021 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

#totaljointarthroplastySecondary#cms

With the push toward rapid recovery following total joint arthroplasty (TJA), clinicians are having to “front load” a significant amount of work, says new research from the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences in Little Rock. Their study, “Electronic Medical Record Audit Time Logs as a Measure of Preoperative Work Before Total Joint Arthroplasty,” appears in the July 1, 2021 edition of The Journal of Arthoroplasty.

Jeffrey Stambough, M.D., study co-author and assistant professor in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences explained to OTW the genesis of this study. “This work is vital as a response to CMS [Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services] and their devaluation of our CPT codes for hip and knee arthroplasty. Although multiple studies have shown that as we try to better ‘optimize’ our patients leading up to surgery, CMS has decreased the relative wRVU [work relative value units] for hip and knee arthroplasty in 2021 by 5.3% from 20.72 to 19.6.”

“However, current THA and TKA [total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty] valuations do not account for any of this pre-op work,” added Dr. Stambough. “Prior studies have estimated pre-arthroplasty work using surveys, retrospective chart reviews, and self-reported time logs. These methods are faulty to the extent that they rely on report bias or general estimates. Therefore, a more objective approach was warranted and may serve to support these previous findings. Our aims were to objectively quantify pre-operative work with THA and TKA using electronic medical record audit logs.”

Using EMR data from 100 elective knee and 100 elective hip arthroplasties, the researchers recorded every mouse click and action in the EMR. For each member of the clinical team, the investigators calculated and summed the time between mouse clicks. They then quantified and compared total preoperative work between groups defined by gender, procedure, age, insurance type, or health literacy.

“The mean time spent in each patient’s chart in the pre-arthroplasty period was 76.8 (SD 47.8) minutes,” explained Dr. Stambough to OTW. “Individuals <65 years of age required significantly increased duration of pre-arthroplasty work when compared to their older cohort (P = .04). The total pre-operative work for individuals <65 averaged an additional 14 minutes when compared to adults ≥65 years of age. Surgeon clinical nurses accounted for more than 50% of the overall pre-operative work (46.7 minutes, SD 39.1).”

“The results from our study suggest that a significant amount of pre-arthroplasty work is unaccounted for in the current reimbursement schedule. Compensation for pre-TJA work is warranted and should not be minimized. Furthermore, fair compensation for pre-TJA work that serves to maximize postoperative recovery is essential to encourage surgeons and their teams to optimize surgical protocols.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy