LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Older TJA Medicare Patients Cost 25-59% More
Large Joints and Extremities

Older TJA Medicare Patients Cost 25-59% More

July 8, 2021 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

#totalkneearthroplasty#totalhiparthroplastySecondary#bundledcare

How much does it cost to treat octogenarians with primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in a bundled care setting as compared to younger patients aged 65-80 years?

A new study titled, “In a Bundled Payment Model, the Costs Associated With Total Joint Replacement in Those Aged Older Than 80 Years Are Significantly Greater,” tackles this question and the results are in the July 1, 2021 edition of The Journal of Arthroplasty.

Co-author Ran Schwarzkopf, M.D., M.Sc., professor of Orthopedic Surgery and associate Chief Division of Adult Reconstruction at New York University Langone Orthopedic Hospital in Manhattan pointed out that this study is first of its kind and, based on what he and this team learned, will certainly not be the last review of comparative costs of care for Medicare patients.

“This is a new topic looking within the Medicare population at different costs of joint replacement between the 80+ and younger 65-80,” said Dr. Schwarzkopf, “we show that even with equal outcomes the cost of treatment goes up, even though the reimbursement is unchanged.”

The team collected data from a retrospective review of 1,866 consecutive total joint arthroplasties (TJA) (1,225 total hips and 641 total knees) at one academic medical institution from January 2013 to December 2017. The study groups were segregated according to surgery type (elective or nonelective) and age: older (≥80 years old) or younger (65-80 years old).

When the research team looked at their data, they found that costs for the older patient group were 24.5% more than in the younger group. The team also collect data for total hip patients aged ≥90 years and found that finding that the cost difference increased to 58.7%. For older total knee patients, the cost disparity from younger patients was 17.0%. Sex, body mass index, and race did not significantly impact this cost difference.

“Even with equal outcomes patients older than 80 had significantly increased cost of care,” explained Dr. Schwarzkopf to OTW. Without a reimbursement adjustment from Medicare “this can lead surgeons and hospitals to decline treatment in this age group, even though we show their outcomes are equivalent but due to their age they may need a longer hospital stay or more help after surgery for recovery.”

“But this extra care increases the cost and within the bundled payment by CMS [the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services] can lead to large losses to the hospital and surgeon. Obviously, this can lead to a large access to care problem for this group of patients. CMS needs to adopt a different reimbursement scale with increased reimbursement for older patients in order to preserve equal access to care.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy