LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/TXA OK in Cardiac/Knee Replacement Patients?
Large Joints and Extremities

TXA OK in Cardiac/Knee Replacement Patients?

June 9, 2021 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

#totaljointarthroplastySecondary#tranexamicacid

Citing controversy on the use of tranexamic acid (TXA) in patients with coronary artery disease who undergo total joint arthroplasty (TJA), researchers from the New York University (NYU) Langone Orthopedic Hospital/Hospital for Joint Diseases in Manhattan decided to organize what became a first-of-a-kind study.

Their work, “Tranexamic Acid Is Safe in Patients with a History of Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty,” was published in the May 19, 2021, edition of The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.

Co-author Ran Schwarzkopf M.D., M.Sc. associate chief of the division of adult reconstruction at the New York University Langone Orthopedic Hospital/Hospital for Joint Diseases in Manhattan, explained to OTW that this particular study was truly a first of its kind.

“This was the first paper looking at the relationship of coronary artery disease patients and treatment with intravenous (IV) TXA and topical administration. We wanted to see if there is an increase in complications among these patients (such as myocardial infarction or cardiac issues). Previous papers that looked at TXA and risk factors may have looked at patients with coronary artery disease as a sub analysis and not as main goal.”

The researchers did a retrospective chart review of cases from June 2011 to September 2019, identifying the total number of consecutive patients who underwent a primary total joint arthroplasty. Of those who were given intraoperative TXA, they identified 26,808 patients at risk of a cardiac event.

The team found no postoperative myocardial infarctions and no significant differences in terms of venous thromboembolism rates “compared with the control cohort using either topical or intravenous TXA, with regard to coronary artery disease (0.29% compared with 0.76%; p = 0.09) or coronary stents (0% compared with 0.76%; p = 0.14).”

“Moreover, there was no significant difference observed in venous thromboembolism rates rates when administration was subcategorized into intravenous and topical methods with regard to coronary artery disease (0.13% compared with 0.72%; p = 0.12) or coronary stents (0% compared with 0%; p = 1.0).”

“The most important thing,” said Dr. Schwarzkopf to OTW, “is that we saw no increased complications among coronary artery disease patients that were treated with either IV or topical TXA. This allows us to use TXA freely with these patients, we are well aware of the advantages of TXA on blood loss recovery and decreased infections.”

Advertisement

Regarding the clinical implications of this work, Dr. Schwarzkopf commented to OTW, “The main clinical benefit is removing one of the last contra or partial contra indications for TXA use in total joint patients. This will allow hospitals to update their protocols to allow TXA use freely in coronary artery disease.”

When OTW asked if orthopedic surgeons might wait for further research in this area, Dr. Schwarzkopf stated, “I think this study will help solidify the common belief that TXA is safe in coronary artery disease patients. I do not think that surgeons will keep waiting for more papers to feel comfortable with this conclusion.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy