LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/More Spine Fusion Levels, More Hip Problems?
Spine

More Spine Fusion Levels, More Hip Problems?

June 16, 2021 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

#lumbarspinalfusion#hipjoint#jointspace

Is the number of spine fusion levels an underappreciated, possibly ignored risk factor for subsequent hip problems?

Researchers from the Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine in Japan set out to examine whether the number of lumbar spinal fusion levels has the effect of increasing force in the hip joint leading to accelerated wear of the joint space.

Their work, “Number of Levels of Spinal Fusion Associated with the Rate of Joint-Space Narrowing in the Hip,” appears in the June 2, 2021, edition of The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.

Citing the novelty of their work was co-author Toshiyuki Kawai, M.D., Ph.D., who told OTW, “To date, there has been no report that examined the effects of long fusion [constructs] on the degeneration of the hip joint. But there was a related article by Lum et al. that was a type of database analysis in which authors calculated the ratio of patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty after spinal fusion and demonstrated that female patients who underwent spinal fusion of seven levels or more were more likely to require total hip arthroplasty afterward.”

The research team enrolled 205 patients who had been treated with lumbar or lumbo-sacral fusion from July 2011 to September 2018 and collected data for:

  • degenerative disc disease (n = 134),
  • degenerative scoliosis (n = 39),
  • spondylolisthesis (n = 25),
  • osteoporotic vertebral collapse (n = 4), and
  • spondylolysis (n = 3).

The team then categorized each patient according to the number of levels fused: (single, 1 level; short, 2 to 3 levels; middle, 4 to 6 levels; and long, ‡7 levels).

According to Dr. Kawai, the team found that the rate of joint-space narrowing for all patients was 0.114 ± 0.168 mm/year. More specifically, the team documented clear differences between patients with single level fusion and multiple level fusion.

To quote from the study paper: “The narrowing rate for single- level fusion was 0.062 ± 0.087 mm/year, whereas that for fusion of ‡7 levels was 0.307 ± 0.254 mm/year. In the multivariate regression analysis, only the length of fusion (standardized coefficient [SC] = 0.374, p < 0.0001) was associated with an increased narrowing rate.”

Advertisement

“When the narrowing rate was normalized by height, female sex was another risk factor for increased narrowing (SC = 0.109, p = 0.023). Secondary regression modeling performed with patients who underwent spinal fusion for degenerative disc disease showed that the length of fusion (SC = 0.454, p < 0.0001) and female sex (SC = 0.138, p = 0.033) were associated with increased joint-space narrowing.”

Dr. Kawai told OTW, “The joint narrowing rate in the hip was statistically significantly increased after longer spinal fusion even after adjustments were made for all the confounding variables including sex, age and diagnosis. Patients with hip arthritis, hip dysplasia, rheumatoid arthritis had been excluded from analysis.”

“The hip joint can be regarded as the adjacent joint to the lumbar spine. If patients undergo spinal fusion that may limit the mobility of the sacrum, which can increase the mechanical force on the hip joint. Spinal fusion is an established procedure and widely performed these days.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy