LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/After 3,721 Total Joint Replacements, One Thing Is Clear…
Large Joints and Extremities

After 3,721 Total Joint Replacements, One Thing Is Clear…

June 16, 2021 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

#totalhiparthroplasty#totaljointarthroplastySecondary#postoperativechemistrypanels

Routine postop chemistry panels are not necessary—at least that’s the conclusion of new research from the Rothman Orthopaedic Institute in Philadelphia.

After thousands of total knee and hip arthroplasty procedures, Rothman’s research team, noting the rising rate of short-stay procedures, published what they learned in a new study titled, “Routine Postoperative Chemistry Panels Are Not Necessary for Most Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients,” which now appears in the June 2, 2021, edition of The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.

“While this topic has been explored previously,” explained co-author Matthew Austin, M.D. to OTW, “the strength of our study was the relatively large cohort of patients and inclusion of both total hip and total knee patients.”

Along with colleagues, Dr. Austin, director of adult reconstruction at Rothman, looked at data from 3,162 patients who had been treated with 3,721 TJA (total joint arthroplasty) procedures of which 1,939 were total hip arthroplasty and 1,782 were total knees. All the patients were administered pre- and postoperative chem-7 testing (lab tests traditionally obtained after TJA).

And what did the authors learn from this study? Basically, the labs were not worth the time and cost. Specifically, quoting from the paper itself, the authors wrote, “Our findings indicate that an abnormal preoperative laboratory result, diabetes mellitus, renal disease, and/or prescribed ACE [angiotensin-converting enzyme]/ARBs [angiotensin receptor blockers] or diuretics are consistent risk factors for abnormal postoperative electrolyte results. The identification of specific risk factors in combination with the small variance of postoperative electrolyte results highlights the lack of need for routine chem-7 panels in the majority of patients undergoing TJA.”  [emphasis added]

Dr. Austin expanded on his published comments with OTW: “In this era of delivering cost-effective care, our study suggests that selective, patient-specific ordering of chemistry labs following TJA is safe. We would like to highlight that a select cohort of patients may benefit from postoperative chemistry labs. These include patients with abnormal preoperative chemistry labs or renal function, patients on medications that may affect renal function or bilateral TJA performed on the same day.”

“This large retrospective study suggests that routine labs after TJA may not be necessary for most patients. This is particularly relevant with the rise of same day discharge TJA as patients undergoing outpatient TJA do not undergo routine post-discharge lab testing.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy